Cited by 34Nuclear Structure and FunctionGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsProtein Structure and Dynamics

ISOLATION AND SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF CELL NUCLEI FROM BRAIN CORTEX OF ADULT CAT

Open access
Hadjiolov, A. A., Tencheva, Z. S., Bojadjieva-Mikhailova, A. G.·1965·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

A rapid detergent method for the isolation of nuclei from cat brain cortex is described. It involves the homogenization of the tissue in buffered 0.34 M sucrose with the addition of the non-ionic detergent Cemulsol NPT 12 and the subsequent low speed centrifugal sieving of the nuclei through two layers of sucrose (0.68 M and 1.0 M). The final purification is achieved by high speed centrifugation (40,000 g) of the nuclear suspension layered over 1.8 M sucrose. Observations by light microscopy indicate that highly purified and well preserved nuclei are obtained from neurons and glial cells. Electron microscopy reveals some microsomal contaminants adhering to the nuclear membrane. According to an analysis of the nuclear size distribution, a considerable loss of smaller nuclei (10 to 20micro(2)), mainly from glial cells, occurs during the purification procedure. The action of different detergents is compared, the best results being obtained with Cemulsol NPT 12 or Triton X-100. Chemical analyses of the purified nuclear fraction give the following content expressed in picograms per nucleus: DNA, 6.54; RNA, 2.94; cholesterol, 1.50; and protein, 97.5. The sucrose density gradient centrifugation of nuclei isolated from cat brain cortex shows that their density is equal to or higher than that of 2.2 M sucrose and is thus similar to the density of nuclei from other tissues. The observation of a varying influence of different suspending media on the density of brain cell nuclei resolves the conflicting data in the literature on the density of these nuclei.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.26.2.383

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein yield after FANS is somewhat lower than expected based on the known average weight of protein per nucleus from mammalian brain (~100 pg).

    “This is consistent with a somewhat lower protein yield after FANS than expected based on the known average weight of protein per nucleus from mammalian brain (~100 pg)38.”

    From Neuron Enriched Nuclear Proteome Isolated from Human Brain (2013) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Chemical Characteristics of Purified Nuclei section (p. 387, Table II) reports 97.5 pg of protein per nucleus, supporting the approximately 100 pg benchmark. The measurement is for purified nuclei from adult cat brain cortex, not an established average across mammalian brains. The sentence's comparison with FANS yield is the citing authors' own conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hadjiolov, A. A., Tencheva, Z. S., & Bojadjieva-Mikhailova, A. G.
Affiliations
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
1965-08-01
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
383-393
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2064213936
Cited by
34
References
11
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
cerebral cortex, cats, detergent extraction, Triton X-100, sucrose density gradient centrifugation, nuclear density, glial cells, neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Cell Nucleus, Centrifugation, Cerebral Cortex, Chemistry, Cholesterol, Detergents, DNA, Microscopy, Electron, Microscopy, Phase-Contrast, Neurons, Proteins, RNA, Chemical Phenomena, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review