The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HUMAN WOUND REPAIR
Open accessAbstract
Connective tissue repair was studied in a series of skin wounds in young adult males. The tissues were examined at 3, 12, and 24 hr, and at 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21 days after wounding. The neutrophilic leukocytes contain within membrane-bounded vacuoles some fibrin and serum protein from the wound; however, most of the granulocytes lyse and release their cytoplasmic contents into the extracellular space. The mononuclear cells undergo a series of morphologic alterations during which they develop a modest amount of relatively poorly developed rough endoplasmic reticulum and an extensive system of smooth-surfaced membranes prior to active phagocytosis. They could be clearly distinguished from immature fibroblasts by the differences in the development of their organelles, particularly the rough endoplasmic reticulum. The perivascular connective tissue adjacent to the wound contains cells which appear like poorly developed or immature fibroblasts. The development of these cells into mature fibroblasts can be followed during the different stages of wound repair. Intimate contact was observed between basal cells of the regenerated epidermis and monocytes in the wound below: cytoplasmic projections of the basal cells extended beneath the basement lamina to the surface of the monocytes. Such contacts were seen only on the 4th–7th day after wounding. Their possible significance is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WOUND HEALING AND COLLAGEN FORMATION
Ross, R., & Benditt, E. P. (1962) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.12.3.533 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Inflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage
Koh, T. J., & DiPietro, L. A. (2011) · Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1017/s1462399411001943 · Cited by 1,667
Advances in skin grafting and treatment of cutaneous wounds
Sun, B. K., Siprashvili, Z., & Khavari, P. A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1253836 · Cited by 972
Age-Related Alterations in the Inflammatory Response to Dermal Injury
Swift, M. E., Burns, A. L., Gray, K. L., & DiPietro, L. A. (2001) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01539.x · Cited by 398
The neutrophilic leukocyte in wound repair
Simpson, D. M., & Ross, R. (1972) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci107007 · Cited by 394
Self-citationA PATTERN OF EPIDERMAL CELL MIGRATION DURING WOUND HEALING
Krawczyk, W. S. (1971) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.49.2.247 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, R., & Odland, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1968-10-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 152-168
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2103536564
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 45.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HUMAN WOUND REPAIR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.39.1.152
- The paper
- Ross, R., & Odland, G. (1968). HUMAN WOUND REPAIR. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.39.1.152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.