Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TISSUE FRACTION-PAST AND PRESENT

de Duve, Christian·1971·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

THIS IS NOT a review. I t is an essay, conceived in the first place as a tribute to one of the founders of modern biology. Accordingly, it dwells over the past and considers tissue fracfionation mainly in its historical perspective. I t does take a brief look at the present state of the art, mainly in order to give some sort of idea of what has been accomplished in the last 25 years thanks to the development of tissue fractionafion. This survery is restricted to liver, the original object of the method. The bibliography is mainly historical, but includes references to a few recent reviews and research papers, through which much of the remaining literature can easily be traced back.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.50.1.20d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
de Duve, C.
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
1971-07-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
20d-55d
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W4321429512
Cited by
340
References
0
FWCI
25.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TISSUE FRACTION-PAST AND PRESENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.50.1.20d
The paper
de Duve, C. (1971). TISSUE FRACTION-PAST AND PRESENT. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.50.1.20d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.