The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DIFFERENTIATION OF MONOCYTES
Open accessAbstract
The origin, content, and fate of azurophil granules of blood monocytes were investigated in several species (rabbit, guinea pig, human) by electron microscopy and cytochemistry. The life cycle of monocytes consists of maturation in bone marrow, transit in blood, and migration into tissues where they function as macrophages. Cells were examined from all three phases. It was found that: azurophil granules originate in the Golgi complex of the developing monocyte of bone marrow and blood, and ultimately fuse with phagosomes during phagocytosis upon arrival of monocytes in the tissues. They contain lysosomal enzymes in all species studied and peroxidase in the guinea pig and human. These enzymes are produced by the same pathway as other secretory products (i.e., they are segregated in the rough ER and packaged into granules in the Golgi complex). The findings demonstrate that the azurophil granules of monocytes are primary lysosomes or storage granules comparable to the azurophils of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and the specific granules of eosinophils. Macrophages from peritoneal exudates (72–96 hr after endotoxin injection) contain large quantities of lysosomal enzymes throughout the secretory apparatus (rough ER and Golgi complex), in digestive vacuoles, and in numerous coated vesicles; however, they lack forming or mature azurophil granules. Hence it appears that the monocyte produces two types of primary lysosomes during different phases of its life cycle—azurophil granules made by developing monocytes in bone marrow or blood, and coated vesicles made by macrophages in tissues and body cavities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
de Duve, C., & Wattiaux, R. (1966) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.28.030166.002251 · Cited by 3,033
Cited by
Rovera, G., Santoli, D., & Damsky, C. (1979) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.76.6.2779 · Cited by 985
The Potential of Combining Tubulin-Targeting Anticancer Therapeutics and Immune Therapy
Fong, A., Durkin, A., & Lee, H. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20030586 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Nichols, B. A., Bainton, D. F., & Farquhar, M. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1971-08-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 498-515
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2150922701
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DIFFERENTIATION OF MONOCYTES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.50.2.498
- The paper
- Nichols, B. A., Bainton, D. F., & Farquhar, M. G. (1971). DIFFERENTIATION OF MONOCYTES. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.50.2.498
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.