The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STEREOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF MAMMALIAN SKELETAL MUSCLE
Open accessAbstract
A quantitative analysis of the volumes, surface areas, and dimensions of the ultrastructural components in the soleus muscle fibers of the guinea pig was made by using point counting methods of stereology. Muscle fibers have structural orientation (anisotropy) and have spatial gradients of the structures within the fiber; therefore the standard stereological methods were modified where necessary. The entire analysis was repeated at two section orientations to test the modifications and identical results obtained from both. The volume of lipid droplets was 0.20 ± 0.06% (mean ± standard error, n = 5 animals) and the nuclei volume was 0.86 ± 0.20% of the fiber volume. The total mitochondrial volume was 4.85 ± 0.66% of the fiber volume with about one-third being found in an annulus within 1 µm of the sarcolemma. The mitochondrial volume in the remaining core of the fiber was 3.6 ± 0.4%. The T system has a volume of 0.14 ± 0.01% and a surface area of 0.064 ± 0.005 µm2/µm3 of the fiber volume. The surface area of the sarcolemma is 0.116 ± 0.013 µm2/µm3 which is twice the T system surface area. The volume of the entire sarcoplasmic reticulum is 3.52 ± 0.33% and the surface area is 0.97 ± 0.09 µm2/µm3. The sarcoplasmic reticulum is composed of the terminal cisternae whose volume is 1.04 ± 0.19% and surface area is 0.24 ± 0.05 µm2/µm3. The tubules of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in the I band and A band have volumes of 1.97 ± 0.24% and 0.51 ± 0.08%, and the surface areas of the I and A band reticulum are 0.56 ± 0.07 µm2/µm3 and 0.16 ± 0.04 µm2/µm3, respectively. The Z line width, myofibril and fiber diameters were measured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles.
Close, R. I. (1972) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1972.52.1.129 · Cited by 1,890
Cited by
Gardner, P. I., Ursell, P. C., Fenoglio, J. J., & Wit, A. L. (1985) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.72.3.596 · Cited by 686
Andrews, J. L., Zhang, X., McCarthy, J. J., McDearmon, E. L., Hornberger, T. A., Russell, B., Campbell, K. S., Arbogast, S., Reid, M. B., Walker, J. R., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014523107 · Cited by 389
Ellisman, M. H., Rash, J. E., Staehelin, L. A., & Porter, K. R. (1976) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.68.3.752 · Cited by 261
Hepple, R. T., Mackinnon, S. L. M., Goodman, J. M., Thomas, S. G., & Plyley, M. J. (1997) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1997.82.4.1305 · Cited by 203
Akster, H. (1981) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/bf00210022 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Eisenberg, B. R., Kuda, A. M., & Peter, J. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1974-03-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 732-754
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2039633744
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STEREOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF MAMMALIAN SKELETAL MUSCLE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.60.3.732
- The paper
- Eisenberg, B. R., Kuda, A. M., & Peter, J. B. (1974). STEREOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF MAMMALIAN SKELETAL MUSCLE. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.60.3.732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.