Cited by 120Nerve injury and regenerationMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsHereditary Neurological Disorders

Slowly migrating axonal polypeptides. Inequalities in their rate and amount of transport between two branches of bifurcating axons.

Open access
Mori, H, Komiya, Y, Kurokawa, M·1979·The Journal of cell biology

Abstract

Polypeptides in the dorsal root ganglion (L5) of the adult rat were radioactively labeled, and components slowly migrating in the sciatic nerve (peripheral axons) and dorsal root (central axons) were analyzed, using SDS-polyacrylamide slab gel electrophoresis and fluorography. In particular, the transport rates and amounts of six major polypeptides, i.e., the triplet (reference 15; with mol wts of 200,000, 160,000, and 68,000 daltons), alpha- and beta-tubulins and actin were compared between the two axon branches. In peripheral axons, fronts of the triplet, tubulins, and actin migrate at 2-3 mm/d, 9-13 mm/d and approximately 19 mm/d, respectively. The corresponding values in central axons are 1-2 mm/d, 3-4 mm/d, and approximately 4 mm/d, indicating an obvious asymmetry in the transport rate between the two branches of bifurcating axons. A greater amount of labeled triplet, tubulins, and actin each is found to migrate in peripheral than in central axons. Another striking aspect of asymmetry between the two branches relates to the tubulins/triplet ratio which is significantly higher in the peripheral branch. Considerable proportions of radioactivities associated with tubulins and actin in the ganglion are nonmigratory, which are thought to derive mostly from periaxonal satellite cells. In contrast, most if not all of the labeled triplet is migratory, suggesting a virtual absence of triplet polypeptides in satellite cells. The possible significance of peripheral-central inequalities in slow axoplasmic transport is discussed from the viewpoints of axon volume and axonal outgrowth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.82.1.174

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Mori, H., Komiya, Y., & Kurokawa, M.
ORCID
Mori, H
Venue
The Journal of cell biology
Published
1979-07-01
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
174-184
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W1985864093
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Keywords
axonal transport, dorsal root ganglia, sciatic nerve, tubulin, actin, satellite cells, axon growth
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Axons, Axonal Transport, Ganglia, Spinal, Male, Molecular Weight, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Peptides, Sciatic Nerve, Tubulin, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review