Cited by 172Slime Mold and Myxomycetes ResearchPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationLegionella and Acanthamoeba research

Mechanism of phagocytosis in dictyostelium discoideum: phagocytosis is mediated by different recognition sites as disclosed by mutants with altered phagocytotic properties

Open access
Vogel, G, Thilo, L, Schwarz, H, Steinhart, R·1980·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

The recognition step in the phagocytotic process of the unicellular amoeba dictyostelium discoideum was examined by analysis of mutants defective in phagocytosis, Reliable and simple assays were developed to measure endocytotic uptake. For pinocytosis, FITC-dextran was found to be a suitable fluid-phase marker; FITC-bacteria, latex beads, and erythrocytes were used as phagocytotic substrates. Ingested material was isolated in one step by centrifuging through highly viscous poly(ethyleneglycol) solutions and was analyzed optically. A selection procedure for isolating mutants defective in phagocytosis was devised using tungsten beads as particulate prey. Nonphagocytosing cells were isolated on the basis of their lower density. Three mutant strains were found exhibiting a clear-cut phenotype directly related to the phagocytotic event. In contrast to the situation in wild-type cells, uptake of E. coli B/r by mutant cells is specifically and competitively inhibited by glucose. Mutant amoeba phagocytose latex beads normally but not protein-coated latex, nonglucosylated bacteria, or erythrocytes. Cohesive properties of mutant cells are altered: they do not form EDTA-sensitive aggregates, and adhesiveness to glass or plastic surfaces is greatly reduced. Based upon these findings, a model for recognition in phagocytosis is proposed: (a) A lectin-type receptor specifically mediates binding of particles containing terminal glucose (E. coli B/r). (b) A second class of "nonspecific" receptors mediate binding of a variety of particles by hydrophobic interaction. Nonspecific binding is affected by mutation in such a way that only strongly hydrophobic (latex) but not more hydrophilic particles (e.g., protein-coated latex, bacteria, erythrocytes) can be phagocytosed by mutant amoebae.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.86.2.456

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The phagocytosis rate increases from 1 to 4 bacteria/min/cell during the first three hours of co-incubation.

    “the phagocytosis rate increases from 1 to 4 bacteria/min/cell during the first three hours of co-incubation [22,23]”

    From Genome-wide transcriptional changes induced by phagocytosis or growth on bacteria in Dictyostelium (2008) · cites this paper as [22]

    The uptake-assay passage (around p. 457) reports that wild-type amoebae ingest about four to eight E. coli per minute, supporting the approximate rate of four. It says bacterial uptake was linear for about eight minutes; it does not report a rise from one to four bacteria per minute per cell over three hours of co-incubation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Carbohydrate-binding receptors have been long suggested to be involved in Dictyostelium phagocytosis, though their identification has been elusive.

    “Carbohydrate-binding receptors have been long suggested to be involved in Dictyostelium phagocytosis, though their identification has been elusive so far [22,62,63].”

    From Genome-wide transcriptional changes induced by phagocytosis or growth on bacteria in Dictyostelium (2008) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion (p. 463) interprets glucose-sensitive phagocytosis as evidence for a carbohydrate-recognition site and suggests it might be a lectinlike protein. This supports the proposed involvement of a carbohydrate-binding receptor, but a 1980 study cannot establish that its identification remained elusive at the time of the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vogel, G., Thilo, L., Schwarz, H., & Steinhart, R.
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
1980-08-01
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
456-465
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W1853775877
Cited by
172
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Legionella and Acanthamoeba research
Keywords
phagocytosis, Dictyostelium discoideum, lectin receptors, glucose recognition, hydrophobic binding, mutant analysis, cell adhesion, endocytosis, FITC-dextran uptake, Escherichia coli B/r, latex beads, erythrocytes
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Carbohydrates, Cell Aggregation, Dictyostelium, Endocytosis, Escherichia coli, Latex, Microspheres, Mutation, Phagocytosis, Pinocytosis, Receptors, Drug, Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review