The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of the turning response of dorsal root neurites toward nerve growth factor.
Open accessAbstract
This study reports that chick dorsal root ganglion neurites undergo a rapid (20 min) reorientation of their direction of growth in response to nerve growth factor (NGF) concentration gradients in vitro. Dorsal root ganglia from chick embryos were explanted onto a collagen-poly-L-lysine substrate. After 24-48 h in culture, NGF gradients were applied to individual growth cones via a micropipette containing 50 biological units NGF/ml. The growth cones turned and grew toward these NGF sources. This turning response was not caused by the trophic effects of NGF on neurite initiation, survival, or growth rate. Dorsal root neurites also grew toward sources of mono- and dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate (dB cAMP), cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), and elevated calcium in the presence of the calcium ionophore A23187. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that intracellular levels of cAMP and /or cGMP and calcium may play a role in the turning response of dorsal root neurites toward NGF, but do not establish a causal relationship between the mechanisms of action of NGF, cyclic nucleotides and calcium. Total growth cone adherence to the substrate was measured using a timed microjet of perfusion medium. NGF increased the adherence of growth cones to the substrate, but caffeine and dB cAMP which also elicit the positive turning response, decreased growth cone adherence. Calcium, which did not elicit the positive turning response, produced a greater growth cone adherence to the substrate than that observed with NGF. Although these results do not rule out a role of adhesion changes in axonal turning to NGF, they show that a general increase in adherence does not correlate well with the rapid turning response observed in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neurotrophins as synaptic modulators
Poo, M.-M. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35049004 · Cited by 1,775
Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury: a brief review
Burnett, M. G., & Zager, E. L. (2004) · Neurosurgical Focus · doi:10.3171/foc.2004.16.5.2 · Cited by 688
Calcium regulation of the neuronal growth cone
Kater, S. B., Mattson, M. P., Cohan, C., & Connor, J. (1988) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(88)90094-x · Cited by 579
Mattson, M., Murrain, M., Guthrie, P., & Kater, S. (1989) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.09-11-03728.1989 · Cited by 480
Regulated Actin Cytoskeleton Assembly at Filopodium Tips Controls Their Extension and Retraction
Mallavarapu, A., & Mitchison, T. (1999) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.146.5.1097 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Gundersen, R. W., & Barrett, J. N.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1980-12-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 546-554
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2114837170
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of the turning response of dorsal root neurites toward nerve growth factor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.87.3.546
- The paper
- Gundersen, R. W., & Barrett, J. N. (1980). Characterization of the turning response of dorsal root neurites toward nerve growth factor. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.87.3.546
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.