The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Basement membrane components in healing rabbit corneal epithelial wounds: immunofluorescence and ultrastructural studies.
Open accessAbstract
The nature of the substrate that supports epithelial migration in vivo is of interest, particularly with respect to mechanisms of wound healing. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy were used to search for common substrate components in prototype rabbit corneal wounds: epithelial scrape wounds, in which the corneal or conjunctival epithelium migrated over the denuded lamina densa of the corneal basement membrane (CBM), and superficial keratectomy, in which the corneal epithelium migrated over a bare stroma without CBM. The corneal epithelium moved rapidly over the CBM or stroma to cover the defect within 2-3 d, whereas the conjunctival epithelium required 1-2 wk. In all wounds, fibronectin and fibrin/fibrinogen were deposited onto the bare surface within 8 h after wounding and persisted under the migrating epithelium until migration was complete. Bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPA), a normal component of the CBM, was removed with the epithelium upon scrape wounding and reappeared in the CBM after migration was completed. In contrast, the conjunctival epithelium had a continuous subepithelial band of BPA out to the migrating tip. Laminin, also a normal component of the CBM, was not removed in the scrape wounds, indicating that the region of least resistance to shear stress was between the BPA and laminin layers. Laminin was removed by superficial keratectomy and was not detectable under the leading edge of the migrating cells. Laminin and BPA were restored in the CBM by 2-4 wk. Type IV collagen could not be detected in normal CBM, but was conspicuously present in conjunctival basement membrane and in blood vessels. Focal bands of type IV collagen did appear in the newly synthesized CBM 2-4 wk after keratectomy. These results argue that BPA, laminin, and type IV collagen are not essential for the migration of corneal epithelium during wound healing and support the hypothesis that fibronectin and fibrin/fibrinogen are the common, perhaps the essential, components of the provisional matrix that serves as a substrate until the permanent attachment components are regenerated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Progress in corneal wound healing
Ljubimov, A. V., & Saghizadeh, M. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.002 · Cited by 872
The Ocular Surface: The Challenge to Enable and Protect Vision: The Friedenwald Lecture
Gipson, I. K. (2007) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0770 · Cited by 310
Self-citationKlenkler, B., & Sheardown, H. (2004) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2004.07.008 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Fujikawa, L. S., Foster, C. S., Gipson, I. K., & Colvin, R. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-138
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2038814746
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basement membrane components in healing rabbit corneal epithelial wounds: immunofluorescence and ultrastructural studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.98.1.128
- The paper
- Fujikawa, L. S., Foster, C. S., Gipson, I. K., & Colvin, R. B. (1984). Basement membrane components in healing rabbit corneal epithelial wounds: immunofluorescence and ultrastructural studies. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.98.1.128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.