The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FATE OF MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS IN MOUSE TISSUES AS DETERMINED BY THE MICROBIAL ENUMERATION TECHNIQUE
Open accessAbstract
Observations are presented on the behavior of populations of tubercle bacilli in the tissues of mice during the administration of antimicrobial drugs. The behavior of the populations during therapy with any particular drug was different depending upon whether the tubercle bacilli were subsisting in the lung or in the spleen. Moreover, the pattern of microbial behavior was distinctive and predictable for each drug studied. Changes in the size of the populations of tubercle bacilli in the tissues appeared to be a more sensitive reflection of drug influence than microscopic study of the number and character of the tuberculous lesions. Nevertheless, in untreated animals, pulmonary lesions evolved and progressed steadily to a fatal outcome despite the fact that the populations of tubercle bacilli had stabilized at a relatively high census early in the course of therapy. The uniform persistence of tubercle bacilli in the spleen throughout prolonged drug administration was demonstrated with every drug or multiple drug regimens except for pyrazinamide when accompanied by isoniazid. Cultures of the bacilli which survived in the tissues despite antimicrobial therapy were highly susceptible to the drugs employed when tested in vitro. Thus the survival of the tubercle bacilli in the tissues represented microbial persistence rather than drug resistance. When pyrazinamide and isoniazid were administered together, it was not possible to detect the microorganisms in the spleen or lungs of treated animals. A detailed investigation of this apparent abolition of microbial persistence forms the subject of an accompanying report.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCune, R. M., Tompsett, R., & McDermott, W. (1956) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.104.5.763 · Cited by 307
Self-citation
Cited by
Nonreplicating Persistence of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
Wayne, L. G., & Sohaskey, C. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.139 · Cited by 807
North, R. J., & Jung, Y.-J. (2004) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104635 · Cited by 677
Mogues, T., Goodrich, M. E., Ryan, L., LaCourse, R., & North, R. J. (2001) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.193.3.271 · Cited by 558
Non-inherited antibiotic resistance
Levin, B. R., & Rozen, D. E. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1445 · Cited by 542
Tuberculosis — metabolism and respiration in the absence of growth
Boshoff, H. I. M., & Barry, C. E. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1065 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- McCune, R. M., & Tompsett, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1956-11-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 737-762
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2006786435
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FATE OF MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS IN MOUSE TISSUES AS DETERMINED BY THE MICROBIAL ENUMERATION TECHNIQUE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.104.5.737
- The paper
- McCune, R. M., & Tompsett, R. (1956). FATE OF MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS IN MOUSE TISSUES AS DETERMINED BY THE MICROBIAL ENUMERATION TECHNIQUE. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.104.5.737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.