The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ON THE ABSORPTION OF BACTERIAL ENDOTOXIN FROM THE GASTRO-INTESTINAL TRACT OF THE NORMAL AND SHOCKED ANIMAL
Open accessAbstract
Coliform-free rabbits fed P32 labeled E. coli 0111B4 prior to the induction of experimental hemorrhagic shock were shown to have a substantial amount of the type-specific 0111B4 antigen in the circulating blood, liver, and spleen, whereas normal rabbits fed the same amount of these bacteria and held under identical conditions, but not exposed to shock, have the antigen within the liver, and occasionally in the kidney, but not in the blood. That the antigen recovered from the blood and tissues was derived from this specific strain of bacteria was demonstrated by the use of the hemagglutination inhibition reaction, by the absence of cross-reacting antigens in appropriate control animals, and by agreement in the amount of antigen as estimated by two different technics. Transport of bacterial endotoxin across the intestinal membrane appears to be achieved primarily by passive diffusion. The accumulation of biologically active endotoxin in the blood and tissues of the shocked animal appears to be due to a reduction in the detoxifying potential of the reticulo-endothelial system, and not to a greater than normal absorption of endotoxin from the intestine. The absence of toxicity in the specific antigen extracted from normal liver demonstrates that the degradation of endotoxic potency can be achieved without altering the chemical integrity of the polysaccharide moiety of the molecule. The implications of the hypothesis that there is a continuous but fluctuating absorption of bacterial endotoxin from the intestine are briefly discussed, and the contribution of free circulating bacterial endotoxin of intestinal origin to the fate of the shocked animal is noted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chylomicrons promote intestinal absorption of lipopolysaccharides
Ghoshal, S., Witta, J., Zhong, J., de Villiers, W., & Eckhardt, E. (2009) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m800156-jlr200 · Cited by 662
Endotoxemia in Human Septic Shock
Danner, R. L., Elin, R. J., Hosseini, J. M., Wesley, R. A., Reilly, J. M., & Parillo, J. E. (1991) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.99.1.169 · Cited by 656
Lumsden, A. B., Henderson, M. J., & Kutner, M. H. (1988) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840080207 · Cited by 427
Endotoxin and Bacteria in Portal Blood
Jacob, A. I., Goldberg, P. K., Bloom, N., Degenshein, G. A., & Kozinn, P. J. (1977) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(77)80025-5 · Cited by 393
Adipose tissue derived bacteria are associated with inflammation in obesity and type 2 diabetes
Massier, L., Chakaroun, R., Tabei, S., Crane, A., Didt, K. D., Fallmann, J., von Bergen, M., Haange, S.-B., Heyne, H., Stumvoll, M., et al. (2020) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320118 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravin, H. A., Rowley, D., Jenkins, C., & Fine, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1960-11-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 783-792
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2086786702
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ON THE ABSORPTION OF BACTERIAL ENDOTOXIN FROM THE GASTRO-INTESTINAL TRACT OF THE NORMAL AND SHOCKED ANIMAL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.112.5.783
- The paper
- Ravin, H. A., Rowley, D., Jenkins, C., & Fine, J. (1960). ON THE ABSORPTION OF BACTERIAL ENDOTOXIN FROM THE GASTRO-INTESTINAL TRACT OF THE NORMAL AND SHOCKED ANIMAL. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.112.5.783
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.