The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DEMONSTRATION OF TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENS IN HUMAN COLONIC CARCINOMATA BY IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE AND ABSORPTION TECHNIQUES
Open accessAbstract
Two methods were used to demonstrate the presence of tumor-specific antigens in adenocarcinomata of the human colon: (a) rabbits were immunized with extracts of pooled colonic carcinomata, and the antitumor antisera thus produced were absorbed with a pooled extract of normal human colon and with human blood components; (b) newborn rabbits were made immunologically tolerant to normal colonic tissue at birth, and were then immunized with pooled tumor material in adult life. Normal and tumor tissues were obtained from the same human donors in order to avoid misinterpretation of results due to individual-specific antigenic differences. The antisera prepared by both methods were tested against normal and tumor antigens by the techniques of agar gel diffusion, immunoelectrophoresis, hemagglutination, PCA, and immunofluorescence. Distinct antibody activity directed against at least two qualitatively tumor-specific antigens, or antigenic determinants, was detected in the antisera prepared by both methods and at least two additional tumor antigens were detected exclusively in antisera prepared by the tolerance technique. Whether these additional antigens were qualitatively different from normal tissue antigens, or merely present in tumor tissue in higher concentrations than in normal tissue has not as yet been determined. Furthermore, it was shown that the tumor-specific antibodies were not directed against bacterial contaminants or against the unusually high concentrations of fibrin found in many neoplastic tissues. It was concluded from these results that the pooled tumor extracts contained tumor-specific antigens not present in normal colonic tissue. Identical tumor-specific antigens were also demonstrated in a number of individual colonic carcinomata obtained from different human donors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Occurrence of malignancy in immunodeficiency diseases: A literature review
Gatti, R. A., & Good, R. A. (1971) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197107)28:1<89::aid-cncr2820280117>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 632
Carcinoembryonic antigen gene family: Molecular biology and clinical perspectives
Thompson, J. A., Grunert, F., & Zimmermann, W. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis · doi:10.1002/jcla.1860050510 · Cited by 608
Nicolson, G. L. (1982) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/0304-419x(82)90020-8 · Cited by 560
Human pancreatic carcinoma (mia paca‐2) in continuous culture: Sensitivity to asparaginase
Yunis, A. A., Arimura, G. K., & Russin, D. J. (1977) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.2910190118 · Cited by 373
Current Progresses of Exosomes as Cancer Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers
Huang, T., & Deng, C.-X. (2019) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.27796 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Gold, P., & Freedman, S. O.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1965-03-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 439-462
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2004102690
- Cited by
- 2,310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DEMONSTRATION OF TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENS IN HUMAN COLONIC CARCINOMATA BY IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE AND ABSORPTION TECHNIQUES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.121.3.439
- The paper
- Gold, P., & Freedman, S. O. (1965). DEMONSTRATION OF TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENS IN HUMAN COLONIC CARCINOMATA BY IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE AND ABSORPTION TECHNIQUES. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.121.3.439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.