The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types.
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies of mating preference signified that mice can sense one another's major histocompatibility complex (MHC) types, probably by olfaction. This conclusion has now been substantiated by the use of a Y-maze whose two arms were differentially scented with currents of air conducted through boxes occupied by B6 (H-2b) males and by B6-H-2k congenic males. Four B6 mice, two males and two females, were successfully trained, by water deprivation and reward, to enter the arm scented by B6 or B6-H-2k males. One of the males and one of the females were trained to select the B6-scented arm; the other male and female were trained to select the B6-H-2k-scented arm. Untrained mice showed no MHC discrimination in the maze. The performance of the trained mice in distinguishing between MHC congenic homozygous F2 segregants derived from a cross of B6-H-2k with B6 was as good as their performance in distinguishing the respective inbred strains, thus essentially eliminating alternative and significant additional explanations of MHC-associated sensory discrimination. The data further indicate that chemosensory discrimination of MHC types can be entirely dissociated from sex differences and from the circumstances of mating.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Scent of Genetic Compatibility: Sexual Selection and the Major Histocompatibility Complex
Penn, D. J. (2002) · Ethology · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00768.x · Cited by 503
Wedekind, C., & Füri, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0204 · Cited by 494
Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice
Hurst, J. L., & Beynon, R. J. (2004) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20147 · Cited by 474
Ober, C., Weitkamp, L. R., Cox, N., Dytch, H., Kostyu, D., & Elias, S. (1997) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/515511 · Cited by 373
MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives
Roberts, S. C., Gosling, L. M., Carter, V., & Petrie, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0825 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamazaki, K., Yamaguchi, M., Baranoski, L., Bard, J., Boyse, E. A., & Thomas, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1979-10-01
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 755-760
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2165377361
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.150.4.755
- The paper
- Yamazaki, K., Yamaguchi, M., Baranoski, L., Bard, J., Boyse, E. A., & Thomas, L. (1979). Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.150.4.755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.