The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monovalent fragments (Fab) of monoclonal antibodies to a sporozoite surface antigen (Pb44) protect mice against malarial infection.
Open accessAbstract
Monoclonal antibodies (IG1, k) directed against a surface component of Plasmodium berghei sporozoites (Pb-44) confer complete protection to mice against a lethal inoculum of parasites. The degree of protection is a function of the number of parasites used in the challenge and of the antibody concentration in serum. Passive transfer of 10 micrograms of antibody per mouse abolished or profoundly diminished the infectivity of 10(3) sporozoites, but much higher amounts of antibody were required for complete protection against challenge with 10(4) parasites. Fab fragments of the monoclonal antibodies were as effective as the intact antibodies in mediating protection as determined by the neutralizing assay. This observation suggests that the antibodies interfere with a parasite function necessary for its infectivity, such as, for example, the ability to penetrate into the target cell or to multiply in the hepatocytes. When sporozoites are incubated with the intact monoclonal antibodies at 37 degrees C, a long filament appears at its posterior end (circumsporzoite precipitation [CSP] reaction). Fab fragments are ineffective at high concentrations. However, if after treatment with Fab, the sporozoites are incubated with rabbit antibodies to mouse k-chains, a strong CSP reaction is observed. We conclude that the CSP reaction can result from the cross-linking of Pb44 and that it has the characteristics of a capping reaction followed by the shedding of the immune complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genetically modified Plasmodium parasites as a protective experimental malaria vaccine
Mueller, A.-K., Labaied, M., Kappe, S. H. I., & Matuschewski, K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03188 · Cited by 503
Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination
Ishizuka, A. S., Lyke, K. E., DeZure, A., Berry, A. A., Richie, T. L., Mendoza, F. H., Enama, M. E., Gordon, I. J., Chang, L.-J., Sarwar, U. N., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4110 · Cited by 367
Iida, K., Mornaghi, R., & Nussenzweig, V (1982) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.155.5.1427 · Cited by 339
Self-citationCurrent status of malaria and potential for control
Phillips, R. S. (2001) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.14.1.208-226.2001 · Cited by 266
Coutant, F., Sanchez David, R. Y., Félix, T., Boulay, A., Caleechurn, L., Souque, P., Thouvenot, C., Bourgouin, C., Beignon, A.-S., & Charneau, P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048644 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Potocnjak, P., Yoshida, N., Nussenzweig, R. S., & Nussenzweig, V
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1980-06-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1504-1513
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2120000058
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monovalent fragments (Fab) of monoclonal antibodies to a sporozoite surface antigen (Pb44) protect mice against malarial infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.151.6.1504
- The paper
- Potocnjak, P., Yoshida, N., Nussenzweig, R. S., & Nussenzweig, V. (1980). Monovalent fragments (Fab) of monoclonal antibodies to a sporozoite surface antigen (Pb44) protect mice against malarial infection. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.151.6.1504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.