The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Low and high affinity cellular receptors for interleukin 2. Implications for the level of Tac antigen.
Open accessAbstract
Interleukin 2 promotes proliferation of T cells by virtue of its interaction with a high-affinity cell surface receptor. This receptor is a 55,000 mol wt glycoprotein that is also recognized by the murine monoclonal antibody, anti-Tac. Quantitative binding studies with radiolabeled IL-2 and anti-Tac, however, initially indicated far more antibody binding sites per cell than IL-2 binding sites. Extension of the IL-2 binding analysis to concentrations several thousand-fold higher than that necessary for the T cell proliferative response demonstrated the existence of a class (or classes) of low-affinity IL-2 binding sites. Inclusion of the low-affinity IL-2 binding greatly reduced the quantitative discrepancy in the ligand binding assays. That the low-affinity binding, as well as the high-affinity interaction, was associated with the Tac molecule was indicated by the finding that the antibody could substantially or totally block the entire spectrum of IL-2 binding and by the finding that IL-2 could in turn block all radiolabeled anti-Tac binding. The low-affinity sites were found on activated T cells, several human and murine T cell lines and two examples of Tac-positive B cells. The physiological role of the low-affinity IL-2 binding sites and the molecular changes in the Tac protein that give rise to the affinity differences remain open to investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hatakeyama, M., Kono, T., Kobayashi, N., Kawahara, A., Levin, S. D., Perlmutter, R. M., & Taniguchi, T. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2047859 · Cited by 561
Misu, H., Takayama, H., Saito, Y., Mita, Y., Kikuchi, A., Ishii, K.-A., Chikamoto, K., Kanamori, T., Tajima, N., Lan, F., et al. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4295 · Cited by 156
Tournamille, C., Filipe, A., Wasniowska, K., Gane, P., Lisowska, E., Cartron, J., Colin, Y., & Le Van Kim, C. (2003) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04533.x · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Robb, R. J., Greene, W. C., & Rusk, C. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1984-10-01
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1126-1146
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2142301692
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low and high affinity cellular receptors for interleukin 2. Implications for the level of Tac antigen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.160.4.1126
- The paper
- Robb, R. J., Greene, W. C., & Rusk, C. M. (1984). Low and high affinity cellular receptors for interleukin 2. Implications for the level of Tac antigen. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.160.4.1126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.