The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Production of autoantibodies by CD5-expressing B lymphocytes from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Open accessAbstract
CD5-expressing B lymphocytes from patients with selected chronic lymphoproliferative disorders were used to determine whether monoclonal populations of CD5+ human B cells produce autoantibodies. CD5+ B cells from 19 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and one with diffuse well-differentiated lymphocytic lymphoma (DWDL) were cultured, with and without mitogenic stimulation, to obtain Ig from these cells. 17 of the 20 samples produced Ig in vitro. mAb from nine of the 17 patients were reactive with either IgG, ssDNA, or dsDNA. In every instance, the autoantibodies displayed monotypic L chain usage that correlated precisely with the L chain expressed on the CD5+ leukemic B cell surface. These monoclonal autoantibodies varied in their degree of antigenic specificity; some were quite specific, reacting with only one antigen, whereas others were polyspecific, reacting with two or all three autoantigens tested. Three features distinguish these autoantibodies from those observed in prior studies of CD5+ B cells. First, they are clearly the products of monoclonal populations of CD5+ cells; second, several react with dsDNA, a specificity not previously reported and often seen in association with significant autoimmune disorders; and third, two of the monoclonal autoantibodies secreted by the CD5+ clones were of the IgG class. Although not all of the Ig-producing, CD5-expressing clones elaborated mAbs reactive with the autoantigens tested, greater than 50% did. It is possible that with a broader autoantigenic panel or with larger quantities of CLL/DWDL-derived Ig, even more autoantibody-producing clones might be identified. These studies may have important implications for the antigenic specificity of subsets of human B lymphocytes as well as for lymphoproliferative and autoimmune disorders in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chiorazzi, N., Rai, K. R., & Ferrarini, M. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra041720 · Cited by 1,296
Self-citationB cell receptor signaling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Burger, J. A., & Chiorazzi, N. (2013) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2013.07.002 · Cited by 327
Self-citationYan, X.-J., Albesiano, E., Zanesi, N., Yancopoulos, S., Sawyer, A., Romano, E., Petlickovski, A., Efremov, D. G., Croce, C. M., & Chiorazzi, N. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604564103 · Cited by 149
Self-citationRekvig, O. P. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01104 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Sthoeger, Z. M., Wakai, M., Tse, D. B., Vinciguerra, V. P., Allen, S. L., Budman, D. R., Lichtman, S. M., Schulman, P., Weiselberg, L. R., & Chiorazzi, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1989-01-01
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 255-268
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2186589950
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.