The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endotoxin-neutralizing properties of the 25 kD N-terminal fragment and a newly isolated 30 kD C-terminal fragment of the 55-60 kD bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein of human neutrophils.
Open accessAbstract
The bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) is a potent cytotoxin, specific for Gram-negative bacteria, that also inhibits endotoxin activity by neutralizing isolated bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS). We have previously shown that an isolated 25 kD N-terminal fragment of human BPI carries all the antibacterial activities of the parent 55-60 kD molecule. In this study we have compared the LPS-neutralizing activities of human holo-BPI, the N-terminal fragment and a 30 kD C-terminal fragment that we have now isolated. We show that the N-terminal fragment also has LPS-neutralizing activity as detected by inhibition (up to 95%) of (a) activation by LPS of procoagulant proteases in Limulus amebocyte lysates, (b) LPS "priming" of PMN, and (c) LPS-mediated production of tumor necrosis factor in whole human blood. Holo-BPI and the 25 kD fragment have similar neutralizing potency (in nanomolar range) in all assays toward "smooth" LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4 and O55:B5 (possessing long chain polysaccharide or O-antigen), and "deep rough" LPS from Salmonella minnesota Re595 mutant (possessing no O-antigen). The C-terminal fragment of BPI is devoid of antibacterial activity when tested against BPI-sensitive E. coli J5, but does have endotoxin-neutralizing activity. This activity is weak relative to holo-BPI and the 25 kD N-terminal fragment in the Limulus and PMN-priming assay, but is comparable for inhibition of TNF production in whole blood. We conclude that the principal determinants for LPS recognition and neutralization, like those for antibacterial action, reside in the N-terminal half of the BPI molecule, but that sites within the C-terminal half can also contribute to BPI-LPS interaction once LPS is detached from the bacterial envelope.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane
Vaara, M. (1992) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.56.3.395-411.1992 · Cited by 1,879
Levin, M., Quint, P. A., Goldstein, B., Barton, P., Bradley, J. S., Shemie, S., Yeh, T., Kim, S. S., Cafaro, D. P., Scannon, P. J., et al. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02712-4 · Cited by 411
Endotoxemia: Methods of detection and clinical correlates
Hurley, J. C. (1995) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.8.2.268 · Cited by 318
Scott, M. G., Vreugdenhil, A. C. E., Buurman, W. A., Hancock, R. E. W., & Gold, M. R. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.2.549 · Cited by 270
Dieterich, D. T., Lew, E. A., Kotler, D. P., Poles, M. A., & Orenstein, J. M. (1994) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/169.1.178 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Ooi, C. E., Weiss, J., Doerfler, M. E., & Elsbach, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1991-09-01
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 649-655
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2144588308
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endotoxin-neutralizing properties of the 25 kD N-terminal fragment and a newly isolated 30 kD C-terminal fragment of the 55-60 kD bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein of human neutrophils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.174.3.649
- The paper
- Ooi, C. E., Weiss, J., Doerfler, M. E., & Elsbach, P. (1991). Endotoxin-neutralizing properties of the 25 kD N-terminal fragment and a newly isolated 30 kD C-terminal fragment of the 55-60 kD bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein of human neutrophils. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.174.3.649
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.