The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influenza virus-specific CD4+ T helper type 2 T lymphocytes do not promote recovery from experimental virus infection.
Open accessAbstract
T lymphocytes play a primary role in recovery from viral infections and in antiviral immunity. Although viral-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells have been shown to be able to lyse virally infected targets in vitro and promote recovery from lethal infection in vivo, the role of CD4+ T lymphocytes and their mechanism(s) of action in viral immunity are not well understood. The ability to further dissect the role that CD4+ T cells play in the immune response to a number of pathogens has been greatly enhanced by evidence for more extensive heterogeneity among the CD4+ T lymphocytes. To further examine the role of CD4+ T cells in the immune response to influenza infection, we have generated influenza virus-specific CD4+ T cell clones from influenza-primed BALB/c mice with differential cytokine secretion profiles that are defined as T helper type 1 (Th1) clones by the production of interleukin 2 (IL-2) and interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), or as Th2 clones by the production of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10. Our studies have revealed that Th1 clones are cytolytic in vitro and protective against lethal challenge with virus in vivo, whereas Th2 clones are noncytolytic and not protective. Upon further evaluation of these clonal populations we have shown that not only are the Th2 clones nonprotective, but that pulmonary pathology is exacerbated as compared with control mice as evidenced by delayed viral clearance and massive pulmonary eosinophilia. These data suggest that virus-specific CD4+ T cells of the Th2 subset may not play a primary role in virus clearance and recovery and may lead to immune mediated potentiation of injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19
Lucas, C., Wong, P., Klein, J., Castro, T. B. R., Silva, J., Sundaram, M., Ellingson, M. K., Mao, T., Oh, J. E., Israelow, B., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2588-y · Cited by 2,074
T Cell Responses Are Better Correlates of Vaccine Protection in the Elderly
McElhaney, J. E., Xie, D., Hager, W. D., Barry, M. B., Wang, Y., Kleppinger, A., Ewen, C., Kane, K. P., & Bleackley, R. C. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6333 · Cited by 561
Brown, D. M., Dilzer, A. M., Meents, D. L., & Swain, S. L. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2888 · Cited by 282
Cytotoxic CD4 T Cells—Friend or Foe during Viral Infection?
Juno, J. A., van Bockel, D., Kent, S. J., Kelleher, A. D., Zaunders, J. J., & Munier, C. M. L. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00019 · Cited by 195
Role of free radicals in viral pathogenesis and mutation
Akaike, T. (2001) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.303 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, M. B., Braciale, V. L., & Braciale, T. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1273-1282
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2007827433
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influenza virus-specific CD4+ T helper type 2 T lymphocytes do not promote recovery from experimental virus infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.180.4.1273
- The paper
- Graham, M. B., Braciale, V. L., & Braciale, T. J. (1994). Influenza virus-specific CD4+ T helper type 2 T lymphocytes do not promote recovery from experimental virus infection. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.180.4.1273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.