The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reactivation of latent leishmaniasis by inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase.
Open accessAbstract
Nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS) is required for the resolution of acute cutaneous leishmaniasis in resistant C57BL/6 mice. As is the case in several other infections, the clinically cured host organism still harbors small amounts of live Leishmania major parasites. Here, we demonstrate lifelong expression of iNOS at the site of the original skin lesion and in the draining lymph node of long-term-infected C57BL/6 mice. iNOS activity in the lymph node was dependent on CD4+, but not on the CD8+ T cells. By double labeling techniques, iNOS and L. major were each found in macrophages (F4/80+, BM-8+, and/or MOMA-2+) and dendritic cells (NLDC-145+), but not in granulocytes or endothelial cells. In situ triple labeling of lymph node sections revealed that approximately 30-40% of the L. major foci were associated with iNOS-positive macrophages or dendritic cells. The majority of the L. major foci (60-70%), however, was located in areas that were negative for both iNOS and the macrophage and dendritic cell markers. In L. major-infected C57BL/6 mice, which had cured their cutaneous lesions, administration of L-N6-iminoethyl-lysine (L-NIL), a potent inhibitor of iNOS, led to a 10(4)-10(5)-fold increase of the parasite burden in the cutaneous and lymphoid tissue and caused clinical recrudescence of the disease. Persistent expression of iNOS and resumption of parasite replication after application of L-NIL was also observed in resistant C3H/HeN and CBA/J mice. We conclude that iNOS activity is crucial for the control of Leishmania persisting in immunocompetent hosts after resolution of the primary infection. Failure to maintain iNOS activity might be the mechanism underlying endogenous reactivation of latent infections with NO-sensitive microbes during phases of immunosuppression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relationship between interferon‐γ, indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase, and tryptophan catabolism
Taylor, M. W., & Feng, G. (1991) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.5.11.1907934 · Cited by 1,060
Cited by
Antimicrobial reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: concepts and controversies
Fang, F. C. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1004 · Cited by 1,676
Stamler (2001) · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00495-0 · Cited by 1,261
Identification of nitric oxide synthase as a protective locus against tuberculosis
MacMicking, J. D., North, R. J., LaCourse, R., Mudgett, J. S., Shah, S. K., & Nathan, C. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.10.5243 · Cited by 1,180
Belkaid, Y., Hoffmann, K. F., Mendez, S., Kamhawi, S., Udey, M. C., Wynn, T. A., & Sacks, D. L. (2001) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.194.10.1497 · Cited by 557
Persistence Without Pathology in Phosphoglycan-Deficient Leishmania major
Späth, G. F., Lye, L.-F., Segawa, H., Sacks, D. L., Turco, S. J., & Beverley, S. M. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1087499 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Stenger, S., Donhauser, N., Thüring, H., Röllinghoff, M., & Bogdan, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1501-1514
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2153930422
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.