Cited by 213vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Phosphorylated Peptides Are Naturally Processed and Presented by Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Molecules in Vivo

Open access
Zarling, Angela L., Ficarro, Scott B., White, Forest M., Shabanowitz, Jeffrey, Hunt, Donald F., Engelhard, Victor H.·2000·The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Posttranslational modification of peptide antigens has been shown to alter the ability of T cells to recognize major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I–restricted peptides. However, the existence and origin of naturally processed phosphorylated peptides presented by MHC class I molecules have not been explored. By using mass spectrometry, significant numbers of naturally processed phosphorylated peptides were detected in association with several human MHC class I molecules. In addition, CD8+ T cells could be generated that specifically recognized a phosphorylated epitope. Thus, phosphorylated peptides are part of the repertoire of antigens available for recognition by T cells in vivo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.192.12.1755

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zarling, A. L., Ficarro, S. B., White, F. M., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D. F., & Engelhard, V. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • aBeirne B. Carter Center for Immunology Research, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Venue
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2000-12-18
Volume
192
Issue
12
Pages
1755-1762
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2163955038
Cited by
213
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Experimental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009109, CA-09109)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R37AI033993, AI20963, R01AI020963, R01AI033993, R37AI020963, AI-33993)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
phosphopeptides, MHC class I, antigen processing, peptide presentation, post-translational modification, CD8+ T cells, T cell epitopes
MeSH terms
Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Antigens, Cell Line, HLA Antigens, Humans, Interferon-gamma, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Phosphopeptides, Mass Spectrometry, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Cytokines, Antigen Presentation, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review