Cited by 193T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Topological requirements and signaling properties of T cell-activating, anti-CD28 antibody superagonists.

Open access
Lühder, Fred, Huang, Yun, Dennehy, Kevin M., Guntermann, Christine, Müller, Ingrid, Winkler, Erna, Kerkau, Thomas, Ikemizu, Shinji +3 more·2003·The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Full activation of naive T cells requires both engagement of the T cell antigen receptor (TCR; signal 1) and costimulatory signaling by CD28 (signal 2). We previously identified two types of rat CD28-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): “conventional,” TCR signaling–dependent costimulatory mAbs and “superagonistic” mAbs capable of inducing the full activation of primary resting T cells in the absence of TCR ligation both in vitro and in vivo. Using chimeric rat/mouse CD28 molecules, we show that the superagonists bind exclusively to the laterally exposed C′′D loop of the immunoglobulin-like domain of CD28 whereas conventional, costimulatory mAbs recognize an epitope close to the binding site for the natural CD80/CD86 ligands. Unexpectedly, the C′′D loop reactivity of a panel of new antibodies raised against human CD28 could be predicted solely on the basis of their superagonistic properties. Moreover, mouse CD28 molecules engineered to express the rat or human C′′D loop sequences activated T cell hybridomas without TCR ligation when cross-linked by superagonistic mAbs. Finally, biochemical analysis revealed that superagonistic CD28 signaling activates the nuclear factor κB pathway without inducing phosphorylation of either TCRζ or ZAP70. Our findings indicate that the topologically constrained interactions of anti-CD28 superagonists bypass the requirement for signal 1 in T cell activation. Antibodies with this property may prove useful for the development of T cell stimulatory drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20021024

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TGN1412 was called a superagonist because it could activate T-cells without prior engagement of the T-cell receptor complex.

    “TGN1412 was called a 'superagonist' because it could activate T-cells without the need for prior engagement of the T-cell receptor complex (Tacke et al., 1997;Lühder et al., 2003).”

    From Monoclonal antibody TGN1412 trial failure explained by species differences in CD28 expression on CD4 <sup>+</sup> effector memory T‐cells (2010) · cites this paper as Lühder et al., 2003

    The Introduction defines anti-CD28 superagonists as antibodies that fully activate resting T cells without TCR signaling, and the Figure 4 caption describes human T-cell stimulation without TCR triggering. Our copy does not identify TGN1412, so it supports the reason for the label but not the claim about that specific antibody. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CD28 superagonists bind to a laterally exposed loop within the extracellular domain of CD28.

    “While conventional CD28 mAbs bind CD28 close to the binding site of the natural CD28 ligands, CD80 and CD86, CD28 superagonists bind to a laterally exposed loop within the extracellular domain of CD28 [8].”
  • Conventional CD28 mAbs bind CD28 close to the binding site of natural ligands CD80 and CD86.

    “While conventional CD28 mAbs bind CD28 close to the binding site of the natural CD28 ligands, CD80 and CD86, CD28 superagonists bind to a laterally exposed loop within the extracellular domain of CD28 [8].”
  • CD28 superagonists bind laterally to both subunits of the CD28 homodimer, unlike conventional CD28-specific antibodies that bind monovalently at the top, and this permits extensive CD28 crosslinking.

    “In particular, we showed that in contrast to conventional CD28-specific mAbs, which bind monovalently at the top of the homodimeric CD28 molecule, CD28SA bind laterally to both subunits [8,9] allowing extensive CD28 crosslinking”
  • TGN1412's Fc-independent activity probably arises from lateral binding to the CD28 homodimer, which permits large-scale aggregation through lattice formation.

    “This Fcindependent effect of the antibody is most likely due to its ability to laterally bind to the CD28 homodimer, thereby allowing its large-scale aggregation by lattice formation [8,9].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 193

Authors
Lühder, F., Huang, Y., Dennehy, K. M., Guntermann, C., Müller, I., Winkler, E., Kerkau, T., Ikemizu, S., Davis, S. J., Hanke, T., & Hünig, T.
Affiliations
  • 1Institute for Virology and Immunobiology, University of Würzburg, D-97078 Würzburg, Germany
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • 2TeGenero ImmunoTherapeutics AG, D-97076 Würzburg, Germany
  • Kumamoto University (JP)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2003-04-21
Volume
197
Issue
8
Pages
955-966
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2122700509
Cited by
193
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Experimental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 465)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
CD28, anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody, superagonists, T cell activation, costimulation, T cell receptor, NF-κB signaling, T cell hybridomas
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Epitopes, Humans, Lymphocyte Activation, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Rats, Inbred Lew, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, T-Lymphocytes, Signal Transduction, NF-kappa B, CD28 Antigens, Mice, Rats, ZAP-70 Protein-Tyrosine Kinase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review