The rise and fall of the CD 28 superagonist TGN 1412 and its return as TAB 08: a personal account
Open accessAbstract
Two decades ago, we discovered ‘superagonistic’ monoclonal antibodies specific for the CD 28 molecule which are able to polyclonally activate T cells, in particular regulatory T cells, and are therapeutically active in many rodent models of autoimmunity, inflammation, transplantation, and tissue repair. A phase I trial of the human CD 28 superagonist TGN 1412 failed in 2006 due to an unexpected cytokine release syndrome, but after it became clear that dose‐reduction allows to preferentially address regulatory T cells also in humans, clinical development was resumed under the name TAB 08. Here, I recount the story of CD 28 superagonist development from a personal perspective with an emphasis on the dramatic events during and after the 2006 phase I trial, the reasons for the failure of preclinical research to warn of the impending cytokine storm, and on the research which allowed resumption of clinical development.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This first-person narrative traces CD28 superagonist antibodies from their discovery and preclinical promise through the 2006 TGN1412 phase I disaster to the resumed clinical development of TAB08. It argues that the 2006 cytokine storm arose because human tissue-resident CD4 effector memory T cells respond to CD28 superagonists, whereas cynomolgus macaque CD4 effector memory T cells down-regulate CD28 and therefore failed to predict the toxicity.
Key findings
- CD28 superagonists were found to activate T cells without direct TCR engagement and, at low doses, to preferentially expand regulatory T cells in rats; this selectivity provided the rationale for treating autoimmune and inflammatory conditions.
- In the March 2006 London phase I trial, all six healthy volunteers developed a severe cytokine release syndrome after receiving TGN1412 at 100 µg/kg; two cases were life-threatening, with multiorgan failure. The dose had been based on cynomolgus monkeys tolerating up to 50 mg/kg, i.e. 500-fold higher.
- Later work indicated that the toxic cytokines came mainly from tissue-resident CD4 effector memory cells; cynomolgus CD4 effector memory cells down-regulate CD28, so this species could not reveal the human response. Fresh PBMC cultures also failed to respond to soluble TGN1412 unless the antibody was immobilized or the PBMC were precultured at high density.
- A second phase I trial in 30 healthy volunteers used an initial dose of 0.1 µg/kg, 1000-fold lower than in London, escalating to 7 µg/kg with staggered slow infusion; it was well tolerated, with no detectable cytokines except transient IL-10 at the two highest dose groups. Definitive efficacy and safety in rheumatoid arthritis remain pending.
Methods
- Single-author historical and personal review of CD28 superagonist development, covering the author’s laboratory discoveries, TeGenero’s TGN1412 program, the 2006 phase I trial, subsequent investigations, and TheraMab’s TAB08 program.
- Evidence discussed includes rodent disease models, in vitro human PBMC assays, receptor-occupancy and cytokine-release studies, and a second phase I trial in 30 healthy volunteers; the account is narrative rather than systematic or quantitative.
- The paper synthesizes published and unpublished work, including the author’s own laboratory findings and cited studies from other groups.
Limitations
- Stated: the author presents a personal perspective, and the acknowledgements note that colleagues who checked the statements do not necessarily share all expressed views; negotiations with regulators are explicitly not reported.
- Stated: proof of TAB08 efficacy and safety depends on ongoing rheumatoid arthritis trials, and the drug would face competition from existing biologicals; some patient-cohort observations in MS, SLE, and psoriasis are described as unpublished.
- Evident from the text: this is a retrospective, single-author narrative with selective citation and no systematic search or formal bias assessment; the author also discloses a consultant role with TheraMab, which may shape interpretation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 48 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
TGN1412 binding affinities to macaque and human CD28 are indistinguishable when measured by surface plasmon resonance and flow cytometry.
“affinities of TGN1412 binding to macaque and human CD28 [measured by surface plasmon resonance (Biacore) and flow cytometry] are indistinguishable [39].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] 39. Hanke T (2006) Lessons from TGN1412. Lancet 368, 1569-1570; author reply 1570. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Preculturing peripheral blood mononuclear cells at high density for two days sensitized them to respond vigorously to soluble TAB08 without any need for human vascular endothelial cells.
“those precultured PBMC to our big surprise responded vigorously to soluble TAB08 without any need for HUVECS!”
- Also stated in: § Chapter seven: Understanding the failure of preclinical tests to warn of a CRS · plain
“Paula R€ omer, a PhD student from Venezuela, confirmed the phenomenon of sensitization by high-density preculture in a large number of PBMC samples, optimized it, and studied it mechanistically [45].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] 45. Romer PS, Berr S, Avota E, Na SY, Battaglia M, ten Berge I, Einsele H & Hunig T (2011) Preculture of PBMCs at high cell density increases sensitivity of T-cell responses, revealing cytokine release by CD28 superagonist TGN1412. Blood 118, 6772-6782. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Chapter seven: Understanding the failure of preclinical tests to warn of a CRS · plain
- Findingcitation
Attempts to restore TGN1412 responses using full-blood assays or human vascular endothelial cell cocultures had poor results with respect to background, magnitude, composition, and kinetics of cytokine release.
“several groups tried to solve the supposed problem of the 'missing partner cell' by doing either full-blood assays (including the granulocytes, on which the PBMC then most unnaturally sit), or by including human vascular endothelial cells (HUVEC), both with poor results regarding background, magnitude, composition, and the kinetics of cytokine release (summarized in [43]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] 43. Finco D, Grimaldi C, Fort M, Walker M, Kiessling A, Wolf B, Salcedo T, Faggioni R, Schneider A, Ibraghimov A et al. (2014) Cytokine release assays: current practices and future directions. Cytokine 66, 143-155. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
TGN1412 must be artificially immobilized on the plastic surface of a culture well to induce cytokine release in vitro.
“In order for cytokine release to be induced, TGN1412 needs to be artificially immobilized on the plastic surface of the cell culture well [42]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] 42. Stebbings R, Findlay L, Edwards C, Eastwood D, Bird C, North D, Mistry Y, Dilger P, Liefooghe E, Cludts I et al. (2007) "Cytokine storm" in the phase I trial of monoclonal antibody TGN1412: better understanding the causes to improve preclinical testing of immunotherapeutics. J Immunol 179, 3325-3331. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Some rat CD28-specific monoclonal antibodies activated T cells without requiring simultaneous engagement of the T-cell receptor.
“Unexpectedly, we found that some rat CD28-specific mAbs activated T cells without the need to also engage the TCR [1].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] 1. Tacke M, Hanke G, Hanke T & Hunig T (1997) CD28- mediated induction of proliferation in resting T cells in vitro and in vivo without engagement of the T cell receptor: evidence for functionally distinct forms of CD28. Eur J Immunol 27, 239-247. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Injecting CD28 superagonists into rats preferentially activated and expanded CD4 regulatory T cells.
“injection of such 'superagonistic (SA)' mAbs (also called CD28 superagonists, CD28SA) into rats resulted in a preferential activation and expansion of a subset of CD4 T cells called regulatory T cells (Treg cells) [2]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] 2. Lin C-H & Hunig T (2003) Efficient expansion of regulatory T-cells in vitro and in vivo with a CD28 superagonist. Eur J Immunol 33, 626-638. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
That concentration also saturated the pathway that triggers proinflammatory cytokines.
“it was also in saturation regarding the triggering of proinflammatory cytokines [45].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] 45. Romer PS, Berr S, Avota E, Na SY, Battaglia M, ten Berge I, Einsele H & Hunig T (2011) Preculture of PBMCs at high cell density increases sensitivity of T-cell responses, revealing cytokine release by CD28 superagonist TGN1412. Blood 118, 6772-6782. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
At reduced TAB08 concentrations, a dose range existed with no proinflammatory cytokine release but continued Treg activation.
“lowering the concentration of TAB08 identified a dose range where proinflammatory cytokine release was absent but Treg activation was still observed [53].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 53. Tabares P, Berr S, Romer PS, Chuvpilo S, Matskevich AA, Tyrsin D, Fedotov Y, Einsele H, Tony HP & Hunig T (2014) Human regulatory T cells are selectively activated by low-dose application of the CD28 superagonist TGN1412/TAB 08. Eur J Immunol 44, 1225-1236. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CD28 superagonist therapy has been efficacious in a large number of rat and mouse disease models, as reported in 25 original publications.
“leading, as of today, to 25 original publications describing efficacious therapy in a large number of rat and mouse disease models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] 3. Beyersdorf N, Gaupp S, Balbach K, Schmidt J, Toyka KV, Lin CH, Hanke T, Hunig T, Kerkau T & Gold R (2005) Selective targeting of regulatory T cells with CD28 superagonists allows effective therapy of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med 202, 445-455. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] 5. Schmidt J, Elflein K, Stienekemeier M, Rodriguez- Palmero M, Schneider C, Toyka KV, Gold R & Hunig T (2003) Treatment and prevention of experimental autoimmune neuritis with superagonistic CD28-specific monoclonal antibodies. J Neuroimmunol 140, 143-152. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] 6. van den Brandt J, Fischer HJ, Walter L, Hunig T, Kloting I & Reichardt HM (2010) Type 1 diabetes in BioBreeding rats is critically linked to an imbalance between Th17 and regulatory T cells and an altered TCR repertoire. J Immunol 185, 2285-2294. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Regulatory T cells are dominant and essential controllers of autoimmunity, inflammation, and overshooting immune responses.
- Interpretationreasoning
The proposal that soluble CD28 superagonist fails to trigger cytokine responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures because of a missing partner cell rests on the incorrect assumption that the TGN1412-triggered cytokine release syndrome began in the bloodstream.
“This proposal, however, rests on the wrong assumption that the TGN1412-triggered CRS was initiated in the blood stream.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
TGN1412 binding to CD32B on B cells enhances its ability to activate T cells.
“its interaction with FcgammaRII (CD32B), an Fc receptor expressed on B cells, boosts its T cell-activating properties [51].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] 51. Bartholomaeus P, Semmler LY, Bukur T, Boisguerin V, Romer PS, Tabares P, Chuvpilo S, Tyrsin DY, Matskevich A, Hengel H et al. (2014) Cell contact- dependent priming and Fc interaction with CD32 + immune cells contribute to the TGN1412-triggered cytokine response. J Immunol 192, 2091-2098. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CD4 effector memory cells produce the toxic cytokines that are released after TAB08 exposure.
“the cell type we [45] and the Stebbings group [47] had identified as the source of the multiple toxic cytokines released in response to TAB08, i.e., the mostly tissue-resident CD4 effector memory (CD4EM) cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [45] 45. Romer PS, Berr S, Avota E, Na SY, Battaglia M, ten Berge I, Einsele H & Hunig T (2011) Preculture of PBMCs at high cell density increases sensitivity of T-cell responses, revealing cytokine release by CD28 superagonist TGN1412. Blood 118, 6772-6782. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] 47. Eastwood D, Findlay L, Poole S, Bird C, Wadhwa M, Moore M, Burns C, Thorpe R & Stebbings R (2010) Monoclonal antibody TGN1412 trial failure explained by species differences in CD28 expression on CD4 + effector memory T-cells. Br J Pharmacol 161, 512-526. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Preclinical work before 2006 confirmed that the IgG4 antibody TGN1412 does not mediate ADCC or complement-dependent lysis.
“the expected inability of the IgG4 antibody to mediate ADCC and complement-mediated lysis had been confirmed in preclinical work before the 2006 trial [35]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] 35. Tegenero (2005) TGN1412 Investigator's Brochure. Tegenero, www.circare.org/foia5/tgn1412dossier.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The IgG4 isotype is considered to carry the smallest toxicity risk because it poorly recruits immune effector functions through Fc receptors or complement activation.
“This isotype is considered to come with the smallest risk of toxicity because of its poor ability to recruit immune effector functions via Fc receptors or through complement activation (reviewed in ref. [31]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] 31. Brennan FR, Morton LD, Spindeldreher S, Kiessling A, Allenspach R, Hey A, Muller PY, Frings W & Sims J (2010) Safety and immunotoxicity assessment of immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies. mAbs 2, 233-255. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Unlike humans, mice can withstand a cytokine storm without progressing to CRS.
“In contrast to humans, mice can take a cytokine storm without developing a CRS [48].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] 48. Miethke T, Wahl C, Heeg K, Krammer PH & Wagner H (1992) T Cell-mediated lethal shock triggered in mice by the superantigen Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B: critical role of tumor necrosis factor. J Exp Med 175, 91-98. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because the human cell type that drives CRS lacks CD28 in macaques, the importance of human-macaque signal transduction differences for TGN1412 CRS and its macaque absence cannot be assessed.
“the relevance of these findings for the TGN1412-induced CRS in humans and its absence in macaques cannot be judged because the cell type responsible for the CRS in humans does not express CD28 in these nonhuman primates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The loss of CD28 on macaque CD4EM cells convincingly explains why this primate species did not predict the coming disaster.
“Here, it provided a convincing and simple explanation for the failure of this nonhuman primate species to warn of the impending disaster.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Fab2 fragments of TGN1412, lacking Fc, still trigger cytokine release from CD4EM T cells under tissue-like conditions, though weaker than whole antibody.
“even Fab2 fragments (which lack the Fc part of the antibody) are able to induce a cytokine response from CD4EM T-cells reset to tissue-like conditions, although this is less pronounced than with the intact antibody [51].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] 51. Bartholomaeus P, Semmler LY, Bukur T, Boisguerin V, Romer PS, Tabares P, Chuvpilo S, Tyrsin DY, Matskevich A, Hengel H et al. (2014) Cell contact- dependent priming and Fc interaction with CD32 + immune cells contribute to the TGN1412-triggered cytokine response. J Immunol 192, 2091-2098. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
The Expert Scientific Group scrutinized the sponsor's documents and found no faults or failures to adhere to existing guidelines or scientific diligence.
“which further scrutinized all documents provided by the sponsor [35], finding no faults or failures to adhere to existing guidelines or scientific diligence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] 35. Tegenero (2005) TGN1412 Investigator's Brochure. Tegenero, www.circare.org/foia5/tgn1412dossier.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
TGN1412's Fc-independent activity probably arises from lateral binding to the CD28 homodimer, which permits large-scale aggregation through lattice formation.
“This Fcindependent effect of the antibody is most likely due to its ability to laterally bind to the CD28 homodimer, thereby allowing its large-scale aggregation by lattice formation [8,9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] 8. Luhder F, Huang Y, Dennehy KM, Guntermann C, Muller I, Winkler E, Kerkau T, Ikemizu S, Davis SJ, Hanke T et al. (2003) Topological requirements and signaling properties of T cell-activating, anti-CD28 antibody superagonists. J Exp Med 197, 955-966. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] 9. Evans EJ, Esnouf RM, Manso-Sancho R, Gilbert RJ, James JR, Yu C, Fennelly JA, Vowles C, Hanke T, Walse B et al. (2005) Crystal structure of a soluble CD28-Fab complex. Nat Immunol 6, 271-279. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The 2006 accident was not caused by contamination of the test substance with bacterial products.
“It was immediately clear to me that the accident was not caused by some contamination of the test substance with bacterial products known to have similar effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The preactivated and polarized signaling machinery of tissue-resident T cells is turned off when the cells enter the circulation.
“As had actually been shown in mice 10 years earlier, the preactivated and polarized signaling machinery of these tissue-resident T cells is turned off when they enter the circulation-no need for it during life as a cell traveling in suspension without interaction partners [46].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] 46. Stefanova I, Dorfman JR & Germain RN (2002) Self- recognition promotes the foreign antigen sensitivity of naive T lymphocytes. Nature 420, 429-434. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In cynomolgus macaques, CD4EM cells lower CD28 and escape CD28SA targeting, unlike human CD4EM cells.
“they found that cynomolgus macaque, but not human, CD4EM cells down-regulate the CD28 molecule and hence cannot be addressed by the CD28SA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] 47. Eastwood D, Findlay L, Poole S, Bird C, Wadhwa M, Moore M, Burns C, Thorpe R & Stebbings R (2010) Monoclonal antibody TGN1412 trial failure explained by species differences in CD28 expression on CD4 + effector memory T-cells. Br J Pharmacol 161, 512-526. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Fc receptor-mediated crosslinking adds to TGN1412's stimulatory effect.
“One unexpected finding of post-London TGN1412 research, however, concerns the contribution of Fc receptor-mediated crosslinking to the stimulatory activity of TGN1412.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] 51. Bartholomaeus P, Semmler LY, Bukur T, Boisguerin V, Romer PS, Tabares P, Chuvpilo S, Tyrsin DY, Matskevich A, Hengel H et al. (2014) Cell contact- dependent priming and Fc interaction with CD32 + immune cells contribute to the TGN1412-triggered cytokine response. J Immunol 192, 2091-2098. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The lateral binding and crosslinking of CD28 by CD28 superagonists likely contributes to their high stimulatory potency.
“a feature likely to contribute to their high stimulatory potency”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Weak or tonic T-cell receptor signals are generated when T cells crawl over the surfaces of other cells to scan for MHC molecules presenting peptides.
“Such weak or 'tonic' TCR signals are generated when T cells do what they do when they live in tissues: tirelessly crawl over the surfaces of other cells to scan for MHC molecules presenting peptides to the TCR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] 46. Stefanova I, Dorfman JR & Germain RN (2002) Self- recognition promotes the foreign antigen sensitivity of naive T lymphocytes. Nature 420, 429-434. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
TAB08's distinct mechanism implies possible benefit for rheumatoid arthritis patients unresponsive to current therapies.
“the different mode of action of TAB08 suggests that it might be useful for those RA patients who fail to respond to the existing treatment options.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The RESTORE in vitro assay's readouts are predictive of clinical responses to TAB08.
- Premisecitation
The concentration corresponding to the first-in-human dose of 100 μg/kg achieved over 60% receptor occupancy.
“the antibody concentration extrapolated from the dose applied at the FIH trial-100 lgÁkg À1 body weight-translated not only into more than 60% receptor occupancy, as had been shown by Ulrich Kalinke 0 s group at the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the German regulatory body for drug development [52]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] 52. Waibler Z, Sender LY, Kamp C, Muller-Berghaus J, Liedert B, Schneider CK, Lower J & Kalinke U (2008) Toward experimental assessment of receptor occupancy: TGN1412 revisited. J Allergy Clin Immunol 122, 890-892. source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 17
- Not yet classified. 10
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationCynomolgus monkeys received up to 50 mg per kg TGN1412 without an adverse response, which was 500-fold higher than the 100 microgram per kg dose later given in the trial and exceeded the usual safety margin for a first-in-human dose.
“cynomolgus monkeys received up to 50 mg per kg body weight without an adverse response, i.e., 500-fold more than the 100 lgÁkg À1 dose later applied at the trial, exceeding the usual safety margin for a FIH dose [35].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] 35. Tegenero (2005) TGN1412 Investigator's Brochure. Tegenero, www.circare.org/foia5/tgn1412dossier.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
Not yet classified.
FindingAll volunteers were eventually released from the clinic thanks to the care they received.
“Thanks to the excellent care at the hospital, all volunteersturned-patients were eventually released from the clinic.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] 32. Suntharalingam G, Perry MR, Ward S, Brett SJ, Castello-Cortes A, Brunner MD & Panoskaltsis N (2006) Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti- CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. New England J Med 355, 1018-1028. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSoluble TGN1412 does not induce a cytokine storm in peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures, which obscured its toxic potential in vivo.
“Strangely, no in vitro 'cytokine storm' is observed if TGN1412 is added to PBMC cultures, obscuring its toxic potential in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe authors discovered monoclonal antibodies against CD28 that can activate T cells polyclonally, with a preference for regulatory T cells.
“we discovered 'superagonistic' monoclonal antibodies specific for the CD28 molecule which are able to polyclonally activate T cells, in particular regulatory T cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe entire external domain of cynomolgus macaque CD28, and also of rhesus macaque CD28, is identical to that of human CD28.
“the entire external domain of cynomolgus macaque CD28 (and, indeed, also of the rhesus molecule; the published sequence on which the claim of poor binding was based is wrong) is identical to that of human CD28”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] 39. Hanke T (2006) Lessons from TGN1412. Lancet 368, 1569-1570; author reply 1570. source
Not checked in the free run.
Not yet classified.
FindingThe volunteers were transferred to the intensive care unit sixteen hours later and received expert treatment for cytokine release syndrome, with high-dose corticosteroids as a key component.
“Sixteen hours later, the volunteers were transferred to the hospital's ICU, where they received expert treatment for CRS (with highdose corticosteroids as a key component) [32].”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] 32. Suntharalingam G, Perry MR, Ward S, Brett SJ, Castello-Cortes A, Brunner MD & Panoskaltsis N (2006) Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti- CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. New England J Med 355, 1018-1028. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationCD28 superagonist-triggered T-cell responses do not require overt T-cell receptor engagement, but T-cell receptor presence is needed to generate basal downstream substrate at the slp76 signalosome for CD28-mediated signal amplification.
“although no overt engagement of the TCR is required to obtain CD28SA-triggered T-cell responses, its presence is needed to generate a basal level of downstream substrate at the slp76 signalosome for signal amplification by CD28 [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Dennehy KM, Elias F, Na SY, Fischer KD, Hunig T & Luhder F (2007) Mitogenic CD28 signals require the exchange factor Vav1 to enhance TCR signaling at the SLP-76-Vav-Itk signalosome. J Immunol 178, 1363-1371. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRemoving Treg cells immediately before CD28SA treatment in mice produced measurable blood TNF, IL-2, and IL-6, but no visible distress.
“when we removed Treg cells immediately before applying the CD28SA to mice, considerable amounts of circulating TNF, IL-2, and IL-6 became detectable [15], although this did not result in visible distress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] 15. Gogishvili T, Langenhorst D, Luhder F, Elias F, Elflein K, Dennehy KM, Gold R & Hunig T (2009) Rapid regulatory T-cell response prevents cytokine storm in CD28 superagonist treated mice. PLoS One 4, e4643. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn rats, high doses of CD28 superagonist activated both conventional T cells and regulatory T cells, whereas low doses measurably expanded only regulatory T cells, providing a dose window for selective regulatory T-cell targeting.
“Titration of the CD28SA in vivo revealed that at high doses, both conventional T cells and Treg cells were activated, whereas at low doses, only Treg cells expanded measurably, providing a window for selective targeting of that subset [3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] 3. Beyersdorf N, Gaupp S, Balbach K, Schmidt J, Toyka KV, Lin CH, Hanke T, Hunig T, Kerkau T & Gold R (2005) Selective targeting of regulatory T cells with CD28 superagonists allows effective therapy of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med 202, 445-455. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAll six healthy volunteers in the 2006 phase I trial developed cytokine release syndrome with multiorgan failure, life-threatening in two cases, after receiving TGN1412 as a rapid bolus intravenous injection.
“all six volunteers experienced a terrible, and in two instances even life-threatening, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with multiorgan failure, after having received the drug in quick succession as a bolus intravenous injection [32].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] 32. Suntharalingam G, Perry MR, Ward S, Brett SJ, Castello-Cortes A, Brunner MD & Panoskaltsis N (2006) Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti- CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. New England J Med 355, 1018-1028. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationCD28 superagonists bind laterally to both subunits of the CD28 homodimer, unlike conventional CD28-specific antibodies that bind monovalently at the top, and this permits extensive CD28 crosslinking.
“In particular, we showed that in contrast to conventional CD28-specific mAbs, which bind monovalently at the top of the homodimeric CD28 molecule, CD28SA bind laterally to both subunits [8,9] allowing extensive CD28 crosslinking”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] 8. Luhder F, Huang Y, Dennehy KM, Guntermann C, Muller I, Winkler E, Kerkau T, Ikemizu S, Davis SJ, Hanke T et al. (2003) Topological requirements and signaling properties of T cell-activating, anti-CD28 antibody superagonists. J Exp Med 197, 955-966. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] 9. Evans EJ, Esnouf RM, Manso-Sancho R, Gilbert RJ, James JR, Yu C, Fennelly JA, Vowles C, Hanke T, Walse B et al. (2005) Crystal structure of a soluble CD28-Fab complex. Nat Immunol 6, 271-279. source
Not checked in the free run.
Not yet classified.
FindingThe 2006 phase I trial of TGN1412 failed because of an unexpected cytokine release syndrome.
“A phase I trial of the human CD28 superagonist TGN1412 failed in 2006 due to an unexpected cytokine release syndrome”
Quote in the paperNot yet classifiedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe plastic-immobilization protocol produced TGN1412 responses that mirrored the phase I cytokine release syndrome well, indicating that peripheral blood mononuclear cells contain cells capable of mounting an in vitro cytokine storm under artificial antibody presentation.
“the plastic-immobilization protocol championed by Stebbings and colleagues allowed TGN1412 responses which mirrored the CRS of the phase I study quite well [42], indicating that there are cells present in PBMC capable of responding to TGN1412 with an in vitro cytokine storm, albeit under artificial conditions of antibody presentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] 42. Stebbings R, Findlay L, Edwards C, Eastwood D, Bird C, North D, Mistry Y, Dilger P, Liefooghe E, Cludts I et al. (2007) "Cytokine storm" in the phase I trial of monoclonal antibody TGN1412: better understanding the causes to improve preclinical testing of immunotherapeutics. J Immunol 179, 3325-3331. source
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingcitationIn the second phase I trial, TAB08 was well tolerated at the doses tested.
“The recently published [53] results were a relief: not only was the drug well tolerated at these doses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 53. Tabares P, Berr S, Romer PS, Chuvpilo S, Matskevich AA, Tyrsin D, Fedotov Y, Einsele H, Tony HP & Hunig T (2014) Human regulatory T cells are selectively activated by low-dose application of the CD28 superagonist TGN1412/TAB 08. Eur J Immunol 44, 1225-1236. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory mediator and a Treg signature cytokine.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn the second phase I trial, healthy-volunteer plasma contained no measurable cytokines other than IL-10, which appeared transiently at significant levels in the two highest-dose groups.
“scrutiny of the healthy volunteers 0 plasma revealed no detectable cytokines but one: the Treg signature cytokine IL-10, an important anti-inflammatory mediator which was transiently found at significant levels in the two groups receiving the highest doses of TAB08 (Fig. 3).”
- Also stated in: § Closing remarks · plain
“Dose-dependent release of IL-10, but not of cytokines causing a CRS, in second phase I study (from Ref.[53]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 53. Tabares P, Berr S, Romer PS, Chuvpilo S, Matskevich AA, Tyrsin D, Fedotov Y, Einsele H, Tony HP & Hunig T (2014) Human regulatory T cells are selectively activated by low-dose application of the CD28 superagonist TGN1412/TAB 08. Eur J Immunol 44, 1225-1236. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Closing remarks · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAdding methyl-prednisolone suppressed the in vitro cytokine storm caused by high CD28SA concentrations, while Treg activation and expansion remained partly intact.
“inclusion of methyl-prednisolone, a corticosteroid routinely used to fight episodes of CRS in the clinic, effectively suppressed an in vitro cytokine storm triggered by high CD28SA concentrations while leaving Treg activation and expansion partially intact [53].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 53. Tabares P, Berr S, Romer PS, Chuvpilo S, Matskevich AA, Tyrsin D, Fedotov Y, Einsele H, Tony HP & Hunig T (2014) Human regulatory T cells are selectively activated by low-dose application of the CD28 superagonist TGN1412/TAB 08. Eur J Immunol 44, 1225-1236. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationTAB08 response observations came from healthy-donor PBMCs and from patient cohorts with RA, MS, SLE, and psoriasis.
“These observations were not only made with PBMC samples from healthy donors but also from cohorts of RA [53], MS, SLE, and psoriasis patients (unpublished).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 53. Tabares P, Berr S, Romer PS, Chuvpilo S, Matskevich AA, Tyrsin D, Fedotov Y, Einsele H, Tony HP & Hunig T (2014) Human regulatory T cells are selectively activated by low-dose application of the CD28 superagonist TGN1412/TAB 08. Eur J Immunol 44, 1225-1236. source
Not checked in the free run.
Not yet classified.
InterpretationEndothelial cells first activated by proinflammatory cytokines can restore the in vitro TGN1412 response, suggesting that inflamed endothelium contributes to propagation rather than initiation of the cytokine release syndrome.
“One exception is the ability of endothelial cells first activated by proinflammatory cytokines to restore the in vitro TGN1412 response, suggesting a contribution of inflamed endothelium to the propagation, rather than the initiation, of the CRS [44].”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] 44. Weissmuller S, Semmler LY, Kalinke U, Christians S, Muller-Berghaus J & Waibler Z (2012) ICOS-LICOS interaction is critically involved in TGN1412-mediated T-cell activation. Blood 119, 6268-6277. source
Not checked in the free run.
Not yet classified.
PremiseThe first-in-human dose in the TGN1412 trial was based on the no observed adverse effect level method, which was considered best practice at that time.
“In the case of the ill-fated TGN1412 phase I trial, the FIH dose had been based on the 'no observed adverse effect' (NOAEL) method [35], which at that point in time was considered best practice.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] 35. Tegenero (2005) TGN1412 Investigator's Brochure. Tegenero, www.circare.org/foia5/tgn1412dossier.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCD28 superagonist treatment is therapeutically active in many rodent models of autoimmunity, inflammation, transplantation, and tissue repair.
“are therapeutically active in many rodent models of autoimmunity, inflammation, transplantation, and tissue repair”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimNot yet classified.
Study design and conductThe National Institute for Biological Standards and Control repeated key preclinical studies, including the cynomolgus macaque toxicity study used to calculate the first-in-human dose, and obtained results confirming those submitted by TeGenero.
“were repeated by scientists at the UK's National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) with results confirming those submitted by TeGenero.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classifiedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe cytokine release syndrome was caused by CD28 superagonist activation of effector T cells that released proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF, interferon-gamma, IL-2, and IL-6, which were found at very high levels in blood shortly after dosing.
“the known T cell-activating properties of the CD28SA must have activated the wrong type of T cells, i.e., effector T cells capable of releasing multiple proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF, interferon-c, IL-2, and IL-6, all of which were found at skyrocketing levels in blood samples taken only few hours after the drug had been applied [32].”
- Also stated in: § Chapter four: Experts investigate and react · boosted
“This, indeed, turned out to be true [33]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [32] 32. Suntharalingam G, Perry MR, Ward S, Brett SJ, Castello-Cortes A, Brunner MD & Panoskaltsis N (2006) Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti- CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. New England J Med 355, 1018-1028. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] 33. Duff GWC (2006) Expert Scientific Group on Phase One Clinical Trials Final Report. Stationary Office, Norwich, UK.
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Chapter four: Experts investigate and react · boosted
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTonic signaling and CD28 superagonist reactivity return when T cells reenter tissues, and the same occurs when peripheral blood mononuclear cells are cultured for two days at high cell density.
“Of course, tonic signaling and CD28SA reactivity return when T cells reenter tissues, and this is also what happens when PBMCs are cultured for 2 days at a high cell density [45].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] 45. Romer PS, Berr S, Avota E, Na SY, Battaglia M, ten Berge I, Einsele H & Hunig T (2011) Preculture of PBMCs at high cell density increases sensitivity of T-cell responses, revealing cytokine release by CD28 superagonist TGN1412. Blood 118, 6772-6782. source
Not checked in the free run.
Not yet classified.
InterpretationThe inability of T cells in freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells to respond to soluble CD28 superagonist results from the dependence of CD28 signal transduction on at least a weak T-cell receptor signal, which is then amplified by CD28-derived signals at the slp76 signalosome.
“the inability of the T cells contained in freshly isolated PBMCs to respond to soluble CD28SA is the consequence of the dependence of CD28 signal transduction on at least a weak signal from the TCR, which is then amplified by CD28-derived signals at the level of the slp76 signalosome [13].”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Dennehy KM, Elias F, Na SY, Fischer KD, Hunig T & Luhder F (2007) Mitogenic CD28 signals require the exchange factor Vav1 to enhance TCR signaling at the SLP-76-Vav-Itk signalosome. J Immunol 178, 1363-1371. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe TGN1412-triggered cytokine release syndrome was initiated in tissues rather than in the bloodstream, because only 1-2% of T cells are in circulation while the rest reside in tissues.
“Only 1-2% of T cells are in circulation (and only very few of those interact with the endothelium at any given time, while the rest travels in suspension), whereas the rest reside in the tissues.It is there that the CRS was initiated after TGN1412 injection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCirculating human T cells respond less strongly to activating stimuli than they do in tissue.
“the responsiveness of circulating human T cells to activating stimuli underestimates their responsiveness in tissues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAfter the 2006 TGN1412 disaster, regulators acted promptly to make healthy-volunteer trials safer by requiring more data for first-in-human dose calculations and by strengthening on-site safety.
“the regulatory authorities responded quickly to the disastrous TGN1412 trial of 2006 to improve the safety of healthy volunteers, implementing rules which extend the set of data to be requested for FIH calculations and improve safety onsite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimNot yet classified.
InterpretationPrimate testing cannot be relied on to reveal a biologic's potential toxicity, even when the target molecule matches the human one.
“the use of primates to determine potential toxicity of biologicals cannot be trusted, even if the target molecule itself is identical to the human one”
Quote in the paperNot yet classifiedNot yet classified.
PremiseA single dose of the rat-specific CD28SA JJ316 rapidly expands splenic CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in rats.
“Rapid expansion of regulatory T cells (here defined by FACS analyses as CD4+ CD25+ cells among splenic lymphocytes) in rats after a single injection of the rat-specific CD28SA JJ316.Modified from Ref.[2].”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] 2. Lin C-H & Hunig T (2003) Efficient expansion of regulatory T-cells in vitro and in vivo with a CD28 superagonist. Eur J Immunol 33, 626-638. source
Not checked in the free run.
Not yet classified.
InterpretationThe capillary leak syndrome in the 2006 London trial resulted indirectly from the large IL-2 release caused by the high TGN1412 dose.
“including the capillary leakage syndrome also seen in the 2006 London trialan indirect effect of the massive IL-2 release induced by high-dose (from today 0 s perspective) TGN1412.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified
The paper relies on this without support.
Regulatory T cells are dominant and essential controllers of autoimmunity, inflammation, and overshooting immune responses.
“Given the enormous importance of Treg cells as dominant and essential controllers of autoimmunity, inflammation, and overshooting immune responses”
The paper relies on this without support.
Dose reduction allows CD28 superagonist treatment to preferentially address regulatory T cells in humans.
“after it became clear that dose-reduction allows to preferentially address regulatory T cells also in humans”
The paper relies on this without support.
IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory mediator and a Treg signature cytokine.
“the Treg signature cytokine IL-10, an important anti-inflammatory mediator which was transiently found at significant levels in the two groups receiving the highest doses of TAB08 (Fig. 3).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The RESTORE in vitro assay's readouts are predictive of clinical responses to TAB08.
“Our new in vitro assay using precultured PBMCdubbed RESTORE for resetting T cells to original reactivity [45]-allowed us to study the response of human T cells to soluble TAB08 at titrated concentrations”
Cites
Cytokine Storm in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-CD28 Monoclonal Antibody TGN1412
Suntharalingam, G., Perry, M. R., Ward, S., Brett, S. J., Castello-Cortes, A., Brunner, M. D., & Panoskaltsis, N. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa063842 · Cited by 2,164 · see citing works
Weirather, J., Hofmann, U., Beyersdorf, N., Ramos, G. C., Vogel, B., Frey, A., Ertl, G., Kerkau, T., & Frantz, S. (2014) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.303895 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
The promise of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases
Klatzmann, D., & Abbas, A. K. (2015) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3823 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Miethke, T., Wahl, C., Heeg, K., Echtenacher, B., Krammer, P. H., & Wagner, H. (1992) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.175.1.91 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Matsuoka, K., Koreth, J., Kim, H. T., Bascug, G., McDonough, S. M., Kawano, Y., Murase, K., Cutler, C. S., Ho, V. T., Alyea, E. P., et al. (2013) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005265 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Self-recognition promotes the foreign antigen sensitivity of naive T lymphocytes
Stefanová, I., Dorfman, J. R., & Germain, R. N. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01146 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Abramowicz, D., Schandené, L., Goldman, M., Crusiaux, A., Vereerstraeten, P., Pauw, L. D., Wybran, J., Kinnaert, P., Dupont, É., & Toussaint, C. (1989) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/00007890-198904000-00008 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Stebbings, R., Findlay, L., Edwards, C., Eastwood, D., Bird, C., North, D., Mistry, Y., Dilger, P., Liefooghe, E., Cludts, I., et al. (2007) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.3325 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Eastwood, D., Findlay, L., Poole, S., Bird, C., Wadhwa, M., Moore, M., Burns, C., Thorpe, R., & Stebbings, R. (2010) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00922.x · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Safety and immunotoxicity assessment of immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies
Brennan, F. R., Morton, L. D., Spindeldreher, S., Kiessling, A., Allenspach, R., Hey, A., Müller, P., Frings, W., & Sims, J. (2010) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.2.3.11782 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Regulatory T Cells Protect from Local and Systemic Bone Destruction in Arthritis
Zaiss, M. M., Frey, B., Heß, A., Zwerina, J., Luther, J., Nimmerjahn, F., Engelke, K., Kollias, G. A., Hünig, T., Schett, G. A., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0903841 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationBeyersdorf, N., Gaupp, S., Balbach, K., Schmidt, J., Toyka, K. V., Lin, C.-H., Hanke, T., Hünig, T., Kerkau, T., & Gold, R. (2005) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20051060 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationThe storm has cleared: lessons from the CD28 superagonist TGN1412 trial
Hünig, T. (2012) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3192 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citationLühder, F., Huang, Y., Dennehy, K. M., Guntermann, C., Müller, I., Winkler, E., Kerkau, T., Ikemizu, S., Davis, S. J., Hanke, T., et al. (2003) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20021024 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationLin, C., & Hünig, T. (2003) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.200323570 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationAustin, P. J., Kim, C. F., Perera, C. J., & Moalem‐Taylor, G. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.06.005 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Crystal structure of a soluble CD28-Fab complex
Evans, E. J., Esnouf, R. M., Manso-Sancho, R., Gilbert, R. J. C., James, J. R., Yu, C., Fennelly, J. A., Vowles, C., Hanke, T., Walse, B., et al. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1170 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationTacke, M., Hanke, G., Hanke, T., & Hünig, T. (1997) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.1830270136 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationRömer, P. S., Berr, S., Avota, E., Na, S.-Y., Battaglia, M., ten Berge, I., Einsele, H., & Hünig, T. (2011) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-12-319780 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationEstablishing risk of human experimentation with drugs: lessons from TGN1412
Kenter, M., & Cohen, A. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69562-7 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Na, S., Mracsko, E., Liesz, A., Hünig, T., & Veltkamp, R. (2015) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.114.007756 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationCytokine release assays: Current practices and future directions
Finco, D., Grimaldi, C., Fort, M., Walker, M., Kiessling, A., Wolf, B., Salcedo, T., Faggioni, R., Schneider, A., Ibraghimov, A., et al. (2014) · Cytokine · doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2013.12.009 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Clinical Toxicity of Interleukin-2
Vial, T., & Descotes, J. (1992) · Drug Safety · doi:10.2165/00002018-199207060-00004 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Tabares, P., Berr, S., Römer, P. S., Chuvpilo, S., Matskevich, A. A., Tyrsin, D., Fedotov, Y., Einsele, H., Tony, H., & Hünig, T. (2014) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.201343967 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationSignaling Signatures and Functional Properties of Anti-Human CD28 Superagonistic Antibodies
Waibler, Z., Sender, L. Y., Merten, C., Hartig, R., Kliche, S., Gunzer, M., Reichardt, P., Kalinke, U., & Schraven, B. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001708 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Rapid Regulatory T-Cell Response Prevents Cytokine Storm in CD28 Superagonist Treated Mice
Gogishvili, T., Langenhorst, D., Lühder, F., Elias, F., Elflein, K., Dennehy, K. M., Gold, R., & Hünig, T. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004643 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationHanke, T. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69651-7 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Schmidt, J., Elflein, K., Stienekemeier, M., Rodriguez-Palmero, M., Schneider, C., Toyka, K. V., Gold, R., & Hünig, T. (2003) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/s0165-5728(03)00182-6 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationSoto, P. C., Stein, L. L., Hurtado‐Ziola, N., Hedrick, S. Μ., & Varki, A. P. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0903420 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
van den Brandt, J., Fischer, H. J., Walter, L., Hünig, T., Klöting, I., & Reichardt, H. M. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1000462 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationResponse to 'Storm forecasting: additional lessons from the CD28 superagonist TGN1412 trial'
Hünig, T. (2012) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3192-c2 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationCutting Edge: Monovalency of CD28 Maintains the Antigen Dependence of T Cell Costimulatory Responses
Dennehy, K. M., Elias, F., Zeder‐Lutz, G., Ding, X., Altschuh, D., Lühder, F., & Hünig, T. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.5725 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationEmanuel, E. J., & Miller, F. G. (2007) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265160601111800 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Dennehy, K. M., Elias, F., Na, S.-Y., Fischer, K.-D., Hünig, T., & Lühder, F. (2007) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.178.3.1363 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citation(2006) · PubMed · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationGuilliams, M., Bosschaerts, T., Hérin, M., Hünig, T., Loi, P., Flamand, V., BAETSELIER, P. D., & Beschin, A. (2008) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/590439 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationKitazawa, Y., Fujino, M., Li, X., Xie, L., Ichimaru, N., Okumi, M., Nonomura, N., Tsujimura, A., Isaka, Y., Kimura, H., et al. (2009) · Cell Transplantation · doi:10.1177/096368970901805-619 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationToward experimental assessment of receptor occupancy: TGN1412 revisited
Waibler, Z., Sender, L. Y., Kamp, C., Müller-Berghaus, J., Liedert, B., Schneider, C. K., Löwer, J., & Kalinke, U. (2008) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.07.049 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Bartholomaeus, P., Semmler, L. Y., Bukur, T., Boisguerin, V., Römer, P. S., Tabares, P., Chuvpilo, S., Tyrsin, D. Y., Matskevich, A., Hengel, H., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1302461 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationPrzybył, Ł., Ibrahim, T., Haase, N., Golić, M., Rugor, J., Luft, F. C., Bendix, I., Serdar, M., Wallukat, G., Staff, A. C., et al. (2015) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.114.04892 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationDennehy, K. M. (2003) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/dxg063 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Superagonistic CD28 stimulation of allogeneic T cells protects from acute graft-versus-host disease
Beyersdorf, N., Ding, X., Hünig, T., & Kerkau, T. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-04-218248 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationTGN1412: ScrutiniZing preclinical trials of antibody- based medicines
Hansen, S., & Leslie, R. G. Q. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/441282a · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Superagonistic CD28 Antibody Induces Donor-Specific Tolerance in Rat Renal Allografts
Azuma, H., Isaka, Y., Li, X., Hünig, T., Sakamoto, T., Nohmi, H., Takabatake, Y., Mizui, M., Kitazawa, Y., Ichimaru, N., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02358.x · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationICOS-LICOS interaction is critically involved in TGN1412-mediated T-cell activation
Weissmüller, S., Semmler, L. Y., Kalinke, U., Christians, S., Müller-Berghaus, J., & Waibler, Z. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-12-401083 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Kitazawa, Y., Fujino, M., Sakai, T., Azuma, H., Kimura, H., Isaka, Y., Takahara, S., Hünig, T., Abe, R., & Li, X. (2008) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2008.01.004 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, J., Xie, L., Toyama, S., Hünig, T., Takahara, S., Li, X., & Zhong, L. (2010) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2010.11.034 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationUrakami, H., Ostanin, D. V., Hünig, T., & Grisham, M. B. (2006) · Transplantation Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.10.042 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationWin, S. J., Kühl, A. A., Sparwasser, T. D., Hünig, T., & Kamradt, T. (2015) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.201546104 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationGogishvili, T., Elias, F., Emery, J. L., McPherson, K., Okkenhaug, K., Hünig, T., & Dennehy, K. M. (2008) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.200838223 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationMiyasato, K., Takabatake, Y., Kaimori, J., Kimura, T., Kitamura, H., Kawachi, H., Li, X., Hünig, T., Takahara, S., Rakugi, H., et al. (2010) · Clinical and Experimental Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s10157-010-0370-4 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationShi, Q., Niu, Y., Cao, H., Zhou, X., Jiang, S., Liu, Z., & Fan, H. (2012) · Transplantation Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.02.009 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bischof, A. (2000) · doi:10.1002/1521-4141(200003)30:3
Self-citationRodriguez-Palmero, M. (1999) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-4141(199912)29:12
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Duff GWC, 2006, Expert Scientific Group on Phase One Clinical Trials Final Report
- Tegenero, 2005, TGN1412 Investigator's Brochure
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CTLA-4: a moving target in immunotherapy
Rowshanravan, B., Halliday, N., & Sansom, D. M. (2018) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-06-741033 · Cited by 1,233 · see citing works
The present and future of bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy
Klein, C., Brinkmann, U., Reichert, J. M., & Kontermann, R. E. (2024) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-024-00896-6 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Wu, L., Seung, E., Xu, L., Rao, E., Lord, D. M., Wei, R. R., Cortez‐Retamozo, V., Ospina, B., Posternak, V., Ulinski, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-019-0004-z · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (TNFR2): an overview of an emerging drug target
Medler, J., & Wajant, H. (2019) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · doi:10.1080/14728222.2019.1586886 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Bi- and trispecific immune cell engagers for immunotherapy of hematological malignancies
Tapia‐Galisteo, A., Álvarez‐Vallina, L., & Sanz, L. (2023) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-023-01482-w · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Trial Watch: Immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies for oncological indications
Buqué, A., Bloy, N., Aranda, F., Castoldi, F., Eggermont, A. M. M., Cremer, I., Fridman, W. H., Fucikova, J. P., Galon, J., Marabelle, A., et al. (2015) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2015.1008814 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Cytokine release syndrome and cancer immunotherapies – historical challenges and promising futures
Shah, D., Soper, B. W., & Shopland, L. S. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1190379 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
When liposomes met antibodies: Drug delivery and beyond
Di, J., Xie, F., & Xu, Y. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.09.003 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
When three is not a crowd: trispecific antibodies for enhanced cancer immunotherapy
Tapia‐Galisteo, A., Compte, M., Álvarez‐Vallina, L., & Sanz, L. (2023) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.81494 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Trispecific antibodies for cancer immunotherapy
Yao, Y., Hu, Y., & Wang, F. (2023) · Immunology · doi:10.1111/imm.13636 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Talotta, R., Rucci, F., Canti, G. L., & Scaglione, F. (2019) · Immunotherapy · doi:10.2217/imt-2018-0081 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Trial Watch: Immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies for oncological indications
Cabo, M., Offringa, R., Zitvogel, L., Kroemer, G., Muntasell, A., & Galluzzi, L. (2017) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2017.1371896 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Ehret, T., Torelli, F., Klotz, C., Pedersen, A. B., & Seeber, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00238 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Can preclinical drug development help to predict adverse events in clinical trials?
Chi, L. H., Burrows, A. D., & Anderson, R. L. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.08.010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
What Is the Predictive Value of Animal Models for Vaccine Efficacy in Humans?Preprint
Jameson, S. C., & Masopust, D. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a029132 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Stimulating T Cells Against Cancer With Agonist Immunostimulatory Monoclonal Antibodies
Han, X. N., & Vesely, M. D. (2018) · International review of cytology · doi:10.1016/bs.ircmb.2018.07.003 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Microbiota as Drivers and as Therapeutic Targets in Ocular and Tissue Specific Autoimmunity
Salvador, R., Zhang, A., Horai, R., & Caspi, R. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.606751 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Immune-Mediated Therapies for Liver Cancer
Aravalli, R. N., & Steer, C. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8020076 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Sleep Matters: CD4+ T Cell Memory Formation and the Central Nervous System
Lange, T., Jan Born, A., & Westermann, J. (2019) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2019.06.003 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Lymphocytes at the Heart of Wound Healing
Silva, V. M. D. S., Frantz, S., & Ramos, G. C. (2017) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57613-8_11 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
CD28 between tolerance and autoimmunity: the side effects of animal models
Porciello, N., Kunkl, M., & Tuosto, L. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.14046.1 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Promsote, W., Xu, L., Hataye, J. M., Fabozzi, G., March, K., Almasri, C. G., DeMouth, M. E., Lovelace, S. E., Talana, C. A., Doria‐Rose, N. A., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39265-z · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Pereira, P. D. C., Diniz, D. G., da Costa, E. R., Magalhães, N. G. D. M., da Silva, A. D. J. F., Leite, J. G. S., Almeida, N. I. P., Cunha, K. D. N., de Melo, M. A. D., Vasconcelos, P. F. D. C., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1239572 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Luckey, M. A., Kim, T., Prakhar, P., Keller, H. R., Crossman, A., Choi, S., Love, P. E., Walsh, S. T. R., & Park, J. (2020) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.201948307 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Li, Q., He, Y., & Pan, J. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad511 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Humanized mouse as a tool to predict immunotoxicity of human biologics
Yong, K. S. M., Her, Z., Tan, S. Y., Tan, W. W. S., Liu, M., Lai, F., Heng, S. M., Fan, Y., Chang, K. T. E., Wang, C.-I., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.553362 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Immunotherapy for cardiovascular disease
Martini, E., Stirparo, G. G., & Kallikourdis, M. (2017) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1002/jlb.5mr0717-306r · Cited by 13 · see citing works
PD1 functions by inhibiting CD28‐mediated co‐stimulation
O’Donnell, J. S., Smyth, M. J., & Teng, M. W. L. (2017) · Clinical & Translational Immunology · doi:10.1038/cti.2017.15 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Immune inhibitory receptor agonist therapeutics
Lovewell, R. R., Langermann, S., & Flies, D. B. (2025) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1566869 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Melo, V. A., Nelemans, L. C., Vlaming, M. R., Lourens, H. J., Wiersma, V. R., Bilemjian, V., Huls, G. A., de Bruyn, M., & Bremer, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1191866 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Mechanism-Driven Design of Multispecific Antibodies for Targeted Disease Treatment
Fine, J., Meksiriporn, B., Tan, J., & Spangler, J. B. (2024) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-100522-102155 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Au, K. M., Li, S., Zhang, T., & Wang, A. Z. (2025) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02382-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Orrù, V., Steri, M., Cucca, F., & Fiorillo, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.714461 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Yuan, R., Dou, X., Qian, N., Pan, X., Xu, G., Xu, Q., Dong, B., Yang, C., et al. (2023) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-023-03535-y · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ma, K., Que, W., Hu, X., Guo, W.-Z., Zhong, L., Ueda, D., Gu, E., & Li, X. (2022) · Clinical & Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1093/cei/uxac039 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Interplay between CD28 and PD-1 in T cell immunotherapy
Jafri, Z., Zhang, J., O’Meara, C. H., Joshua, A. M., Parish, C. R., & Khachigian, L. M. (2024) · Vascular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.vph.2024.107461 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cavero, I., & Holzgrefe, H. H. (2019) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1080/14740338.2019.1673726 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fukaya‐Shiba, A., Otsuka, K., Sasaki, H., Shikano, M., & Wakao, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.756870 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
CD28 Superfamily Costimulatory Molecules in Chronic Pain: Focus on Immunomodulation
Shi, Q., Luo, Y., Xiang, Q., Kang, X., & Feng, Z. (2025) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-025-04746-3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Tumor Microenvironment: Translating Intravital Insights into Microphysiological Systems
Imparato, G., Mazio, C., Nevola, P., & Netti, P. A. (2026) · Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering · doi:10.1007/s12195-026-00910-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
New Approaches Targeting Immuno-oncology and Tumor Microenvironment
Zhu, D., & He, F. (2022) · Interdisciplinary cancer research · doi:10.1007/16833_2022_89 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Immunsuppressiva, Immunmodulatoren
Offermanns, S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58304-3_25 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The FEBS Journal past … and present
Chenette, E. J. (2016) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.13974
Origins and Evolution of Drug Regulation
Williams, K. L. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17148-3_2
From Bench to Bedside: The First Studies of a New Molecule in Man
Darwin, K. L. R., Thomsen, L., & Boyce, M. J. (2017) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/bk9781782621423-00379
Renaissance of Phase I trials in India: Lessons from global trials and tribulations of TGN1412
Bhatt, A., & Davis, S. (2026) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/picr.picr_413_25
From T cell engagers to next-generation immune cell engagers for cancer immunotherapy
Yang, Z., & Fu, Y. (2026) · Antibody Therapeutics · doi:10.1093/abt/tbag030
- Authors
- Hünig, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hünig, Thomas
- Venue
- The FEBS Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-06
- Volume
- 283
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3325-3334
- ISSN
- 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
- 1742-4658
- OpenAlex
- W2404966097
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- FEBS Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- TeGenero
- TheraMab
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
- Keywords
- TGN1412, monoclonal antibodies, regulatory T cells, T cell activation, cytokine release syndrome, dose reduction, autoimmunity, transplantation, tissue repair, clinical development
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Germany, Humans, London, Lymphocyte Activation, Mass Media, Cytokines, Treatment Failure, Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic, CD28 Antigens, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Mice, Rats, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review