The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Avidity for antigen shapes clonal dominance in CD8 + T cell populations specific for persistent DNA viruses
Open accessAbstract
The forces that govern clonal selection during the genesis and maintenance of specific T cell responses are complex, but amenable to decryption by interrogation of constituent clonotypes within the antigen-experienced T cell pools. Here, we used point-mutated peptide–major histocompatibility complex class I (pMHCI) antigens, unbiased TCRB gene usage analysis, and polychromatic flow cytometry to probe directly ex vivo the clonal architecture of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell populations under conditions of persistent exposure to structurally stable virus-derived epitopes. During chronic infection with cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus, CD8+ T cell responses to immunodominant viral antigens were oligoclonal, highly skewed, and exhibited diverse clonotypic configurations; TCRB CDR3 sequence analysis indicated positive selection at the protein level. Dominant clonotypes demonstrated high intrinsic antigen avidity, defined strictly as a physical parameter, and were preferentially driven toward terminal differentiation in phenotypically heterogeneous populations. In contrast, subdominant clonotypes were characterized by lower intrinsic avidities and proportionately greater dependency on the pMHCI–CD8 interaction for antigen uptake and functional sensitivity. These findings provide evidence that interclonal competition for antigen operates in human T cell populations, while preferential CD8 coreceptor compensation mitigates this process to maintain clonotypic diversity. Vaccine strategies that reconstruct these biological processes could generate T cell populations that mediate optimal delivery of antiviral effector function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A human memory T cell subset with stem cell–like properties
Gattinoni, L., Lugli, E., Ji, Y., Pos, Z., Paulos, C. M., Quigley, M. F., Almeida, J. R., Gostick, E., Yu, Z., Carpenito, C., et al. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2446 · Cited by 1,974
Self-citationRobust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19
Sekine, T., Perez-Potti, A., Rivera-Ballesteros, O., Strålin, K., Gorin, J.-B., Olsson, A., Llewellyn-Lacey, S., Kamal, H., Bogdanovic, G., Muschiol, S., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.017 · Cited by 1,788
Self-citationCellular responses to viral infection in humans: lessons from Epstein–Barr virus
Hislop, A. D., Taylor, G. S., Sauce, D., & Rickinson, A. B. (2007) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141553 · Cited by 766
Emerson, R. O., DeWitt, W. S., Vignali, M., Gravley, J., Hu, J. K., Osborne, E. J., Desmarais, C., Klinger, M., Carlson, C. S., Hansen, J. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3822 · Cited by 532
CD8+ T cell efficacy in vaccination and disease
Appay, V., Douek, D. C., & Price, D. A. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.f.1774 · Cited by 393
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, D. A., Brenchley, J. M., Ruff, L. E., Betts, M. R., Hill, B. J., Roederer, M., Koup, R. A., Migueles, S. A., Gostick, E., Wooldridge, L., Sewell, A. K., Connors, M., & Douek, D. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2005-11-14
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1349-1361
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2135511012
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avidity for antigen shapes clonal dominance in CD8 + T cell populations specific for persistent DNA viruses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.20051357
- The paper
- Price, D. A., Brenchley, J. M., Ruff, L. E., Betts, M. R., Hill, B. J., Roederer, M., Koup, R. A., Migueles, S. A., Gostick, E., Wooldridge, L., Sewell, A. K., Connors, M., & Douek, D. C. (2005). Avidity for antigen shapes clonal dominance in CD8 + T cell populations specific for persistent DNA viruses. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20051357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.