Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurofascin as a novel target for autoantibody-mediated axonal injury

Open access
Mathey, Emily K., Derfuss, Tobias, Storch, Maria K., Williams, Kieran R., Hales, Kimberly, Woolley, David R., Al-Hayani, Abdulmonem, Davies, Stephen N., Rasband, Matthew N., Olsson, Tomas, Moldenhauer, Anja, Velhin, Sviataslau, Hohlfeld, Reinhard, Meinl, Edgar, Linington, Christopher·2007·The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Axonal injury is considered the major cause of disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but the underlying effector mechanisms are poorly understood. Starting with a proteomics-based approach, we identified neurofascin-specific autoantibodies in patients with MS. These autoantibodies recognize the native form of the extracellular domains of both neurofascin 186 (NF186), a neuronal protein concentrated in myelinated fibers at nodes of Ranvier, and NF155, the oligodendrocyte-specific isoform of neurofascin. Our in vitro studies with hippocampal slice cultures indicate that neurofascin antibodies inhibit axonal conduction in a complement-dependent manner. To evaluate whether circulating antineurofascin antibodies mediate a pathogenic effect in vivo, we cotransferred these antibodies with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–specific encephalitogenic T cells to mimic the inflammatory pathology of MS and breach the blood–brain barrier. In this animal model, antibodies to neurofascin selectively targeted nodes of Ranvier, resulting in deposition of complement, axonal injury, and disease exacerbation. Collectively, these results identify a novel mechanism of immune-mediated axonal injury that can contribute to axonal pathology in MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20071053

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
Mathey, E. K., Derfuss, T., Storch, M. K., Williams, K. R., Hales, K., Woolley, D. R., Al-Hayani, A., Davies, S. N., Rasband, M. N., Olsson, T., Moldenhauer, A., Velhin, S., Hohlfeld, R., Meinl, E., & Linington, C.
Venue
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2007-09-10
Volume
204
Issue
10
Pages
2363-2372
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2141440491
Cited by
390
References
6
FWCI
16.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurofascin as a novel target for autoantibody-mediated axonal injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.20071053
The paper
Mathey, E. K., Derfuss, T., Storch, M. K., Williams, K. R., Hales, K., Woolley, D. R., Al-Hayani, A., Davies, S. N., Rasband, M. N., Olsson, T., Moldenhauer, A., Velhin, S., Hohlfeld, R., Meinl, E., & Linington, C. (2007). Neurofascin as a novel target for autoantibody-mediated axonal injury. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20071053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.