Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interleukin-17–induced neutrophil extracellular traps mediate resistance to checkpoint blockade in pancreatic cancer

Open access
Zhang, Yu, Chandra, Vidhi, Riquelme Sanchez, Erick, Dutta, Prasanta, Quesada, Pompeyo R., Rakoski, Amanda, Zoltan, Michelle, Arora, Nivedita, Baydogan, Seyda, Horne, William, Burks, Jared, Xu, Hanwen, Hussain, Perwez, Wang, Huamin, Gupta, Sonal, Maitra, Anirban, Bailey, Jennifer M., Moghaddam, Seyed J., Banerjee, Sulagna, Sahin, Ismet, Bhattacharya, Pratip, McAllister, Florencia·2020·Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a lethal malignancy with an immunosuppressive microenvironment that is resistant to most therapies. IL17 is involved in pancreatic tumorigenesis, but its role in invasive PDAC is undetermined. We hypothesized that IL17 triggers and sustains PDAC immunosuppression. We inhibited IL17/IL17RA signaling using pharmacological and genetic strategies alongside mass cytometry and multiplex immunofluorescence techniques. We uncovered that IL17 recruits neutrophils, triggers neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and excludes cytotoxic CD8 T cells from tumors. Additionally, IL17 blockade increases immune checkpoint blockade (PD-1, CTLA4) sensitivity. Inhibition of neutrophils or Padi4-dependent NETosis phenocopies IL17 neutralization. NMR spectroscopy revealed changes in tumor lactate as a potential early biomarker for IL17/PD-1 combination efficacy. Higher expression of IL17 and PADI4 in human PDAC corresponds with poorer prognosis, and the serum of patients with PDAC has higher potential for NETosis. Clinical studies with IL17 and checkpoint blockade represent a novel combinatorial therapy with potential efficacy for this lethal disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20190354

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Chandra, V., Riquelme Sanchez, E., Dutta, P., Quesada, P. R., Rakoski, A., Zoltan, M., Arora, N., Baydogan, S., Horne, W., Burks, J., Xu, H., Hussain, P., Wang, H., Gupta, S., Maitra, A., Bailey, J. M., Moghaddam, S. J., Banerjee, S., Sahin, I., Bhattacharya, P., & McAllister, F.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2020-08-28
Volume
217
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W3082256626
Cited by
448
References
89
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interleukin-17–induced neutrophil extracellular traps mediate resistance to checkpoint blockade in pancreatic cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.20190354
The paper
Zhang, Y., Chandra, V., Riquelme Sanchez, E., Dutta, P., Quesada, P. R., Rakoski, A., Zoltan, M., Arora, N., Baydogan, S., Horne, W., Burks, J., Xu, H., Hussain, P., Wang, H., Gupta, S., Maitra, A., Bailey, J. M., Moghaddam, S. J., Banerjee, S., . . . McAllister, F. (2020). Interleukin-17–induced neutrophil extracellular traps mediate resistance to checkpoint blockade in pancreatic cancer. Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20190354

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.