Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 602

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A STUDY OF TISSUE CULTURE CELLS BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

Open access
Porter, Keith R., Claude, Albert, Fullam, Ernest F.·1945·Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

By means of a tissue culture technique, cells from chick embryos were procured in a state which proved to be suitable for electron microscopy. The electron micrographs disclosed details of cell structure not revealed by other methods of examination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.81.3.233

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 602

Metadata

Authors
Porter, K. R., Claude, A., & Fullam, E. F.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
1945-03-01
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
233-246
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2162734772
Cited by
602
References
0
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A STUDY OF TISSUE CULTURE CELLS BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.81.3.233
The paper
Porter, K. R., Claude, A., & Fullam, E. F. (1945). A STUDY OF TISSUE CULTURE CELLS BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.81.3.233

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.