Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bimodal Control of a Ca2+-Activated Cl− Channel by Different Ca2+ Signals

Open access
Kuruma, Akinori, Hartzell, H. Criss·2000·The Journal of General Physiology

Abstract

Ca2+-activated Cl− channels play important roles in a variety of physiological processes, including epithelial secretion, maintenance of smooth muscle tone, and repolarization of the cardiac action potential. It remains unclear, however, exactly how these channels are controlled by Ca2+ and voltage. Excised inside-out patches containing many Ca2+-activated Cl− channels from Xenopus oocytes were used to study channel regulation. The currents were mediated by a single type of Cl− channel that exhibited an anionic selectivity of I− > Br− > Cl− (3.6:1.9:1.0), irrespective of the direction of the current flow or [Ca2+]. However, depending on the amplitude of the Ca2+ signal, this channel exhibited qualitatively different behaviors. At [Ca2+] < 1 μM, the currents activated slowly upon depolarization and deactivated upon hyperpolarization and the steady state current–voltage relationship was strongly outwardly rectifying. At higher [Ca2+], the currents did not rectify and were time independent. This difference in behavior at different [Ca2+] was explained by an apparent voltage-dependent Ca2+ sensitivity of the channel. At +120 mV, the EC50 for channel activation by Ca2+ was approximately fourfold less than at −120 mV (0.9 vs. 4 μM). Thus, at [Ca2+] < 1 μM, inward current was smaller than outward current and the currents were time dependent as a consequence of voltage-dependent changes in Ca2+ binding. The voltage-dependent Ca2+ sensitivity was explained by a kinetic gating scheme in which channel activation was Ca2+ dependent and channel closing was voltage sensitive. This scheme was supported by the observation that deactivation time constants of currents produced by rapid Ca2+ concentration jumps were voltage sensitive, but that the activation time constants were Ca2+ sensitive. The deactivation time constants increased linearly with the log of membrane potential. The qualitatively different behaviors of this channel in response to different Ca2+ concentrations adds a new dimension to Ca2+ signaling: the same channel can mediate either excitatory or inhibitory responses, depending on the amplitude of the cellular Ca2+ signal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1085/jgp.115.1.59

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Kuruma, A., & Hartzell, H. C.
Venue
The Journal of General Physiology
Published
1999-12-28
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
59-80
ISSN
  • 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7748
OpenAlex
W2020754695
Cited by
170
References
1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bimodal Control of a Ca2+-Activated Cl− Channel by Different Ca2+ Signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.115.1.59
The paper
Kuruma, A., & Hartzell, H. C. (2000). Bimodal Control of a Ca2+-Activated Cl− Channel by Different Ca2+ Signals. The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.115.1.59

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.