Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg2+-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels

Open access
Prakriya, Murali, Lewis, Richard S.·2002·The Journal of General Physiology

Abstract

Although store-operated calcium release–activated Ca 2+(CRAC) channels are highly Ca 2+-selective under physiological ionic conditions, removal of extracellular divalent cations makes them freely permeable to monovalent cations. Several past studies have concluded that under these conditions CRAC channels conduct Na+and Cs+with a unitary conductance of ∼40 pS, and that intracellular Mg 2+modulates their activity and selectivity. These results have important implications for understanding ion permeation through CRAC channels and for screening potential CRAC channel genes. We find that the observed 40-pS channels are not CRAC channels, but are instead Mg 2+-inhibited cation (MIC) channels that open as Mg 2+is washed out of the cytosol. MIC channels differ from CRAC channels in several critical respects. Store depletion does not activate MIC channels, nor does store refilling deactivate them. Unlike CRAC channels, MIC channels are not blocked by SKF 96365, are not potentiated by low doses of 2-APB, and are less sensitive to block by high doses of the drug. By applying 8–10 mM intracellular Mg 2+to inhibit MIC channels, we examined monovalent permeation through CRAC channels in isolation. A rapid switch from 20 mM Ca 2+to divalent-free extracellular solution evokes Na+current through open CRAC channels (Na+-I CRAC) that is initially eightfold larger than the preceding Ca 2+current and declines by ∼80% over 20 s. Unlike MIC channels, CRAC channels are largely impermeable to Cs+(P Cs/P Na= 0.13 vs. 1.2 for MIC). Neither the decline in Na+-I CRAC nor its low Cs+permeability are affected by intracellular Mg 2+(90 μM to 10 mM). Single openings of monovalent CRAC channels were not detectable in whole-cell recordings, but a unitary conductance of 0.2 pS was estimated from noise analysis. This new information about the selectivity, conductance, and regulation of CRAC channels forces a revision of the biophysical fingerprint of CRAC channels, and reveals intriguing similarities and differences in permeation mechanisms of voltage-gated and store-operated Ca 2+channels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1085/jgp.20028551

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Prakriya, M., & Lewis, R. S.
Venue
The Journal of General Physiology
Published
2002-04-29
Volume
119
Issue
5
Pages
487-508
ISSN
  • 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7748
OpenAlex
W2115680989
Cited by
268
References
0
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg2+-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.20028551
The paper
Prakriya, M., & Lewis, R. S. (2002). Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg2+-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels. The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.20028551

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.