The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MAINTAINED ACTIVITY IN THE CAT'S RETINA IN LIGHT AND DARKNESS
Open accessAbstract
Nervous activity has been recorded from the unopened eye of decerebrate cats. Recordings were made with metal electrodes or with small micropipettes from ganglion cells or nerve fibers. Continuous maintained discharges were seen in all ganglion cells during steady illumination of their receptive fields, as well as in complete darkness. Possible artefacts, such as electrode pressure, abnormal circulation, anesthetic, and several other factors have been excluded as the source of the maintained discharge. Visual stimuli are therefore transmitted by modulating the ever present background activity. Discharge frequencies were measured following changes of retinal illumination. No consistent patterns of frequency change were found. The maintained discharge frequency may be permanently increased or decreased, or may remain practically unchanged by altering the steady level of illumination. In addition, there were often transient frequency changes during the first 5 to 10 minutes after changing illumination, before a final steady rate was established. A statistical analysis of the impulse intervals of the maintained discharge showed: (a) the intervals were distributed according to the gamma distribution (Pearson's type III), (b) the first serial correlation coefficient of the intervals was between –0.10 and –0.24, with a mean value of –0.17, which is significantly different from zero, (c) the higher order serial correlation coefficients were not significantly different from zero. Thus the firing probability at any time depends on the times of occurrence of the two preceding impulses only, and in such a way as to indicate that each impulse is followed by a transient depression of excitability that outlasts the following impulse. The possible sites at which spontaneous or maintained activity may originate in the retina are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
Partitioning neuronal variability
Goris, R. L. T., Movshon, J. A., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3711 · Cited by 528
Relating neuronal firing patterns to functional differentiation of cerebral cortex.
Shinomoto, S., Kim, H., Shimokawa, T., Matsuno, N., Funahashi, S., Shima, K., Fujita, I., Tamura, H., Doi, T., Kawano, K., et al. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000433 · Cited by 239
Motor output patterns during random and rhythmic stimulation of locust thoracic ganglia
Wilson, D. M., & Wyman, R. J. (1965) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(65)86706-6 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuffler, S. W., Fitzhugh, R., & Barlow, H. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of General Physiology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1957-05-20
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 683-702
- ISSN
- 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7748
- OpenAlex
- W2034108404
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MAINTAINED ACTIVITY IN THE CAT'S RETINA IN LIGHT AND DARKNESS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.40.5.683
- The paper
- Kuffler, S. W., Fitzhugh, R., & Barlow, H. B. (1957). MAINTAINED ACTIVITY IN THE CAT'S RETINA IN LIGHT AND DARKNESS. The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.40.5.683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.