The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anatomy and Physiology of Vision in the Frog (Rana pipiens)
Open accessAbstract
Frogs arc essentially dependent on vision. They fccd on worms, flies, and other insects which they catch directly with the mouth or by striking them with the tongue; for this they use only visual clues. Furthermore, frogs prey only on moving insects, and their attention is never attracted by stationary creatures or objects. Nor do they respond with feeding behavior to a large moving object, instead it provokes an escape reaction. For them, a form deprived of movement SCClnS to bc behaviorally meaningless. Frogs, then, appear to recognize their prey and select it for attack from among all other environmental objects because it exhibits a number of features such as movement, a certain size, some contrast, and, perhaps, also a certain color. Furthermore, this ability of frogs to recognize their prey and to snap at it is not altered by changes in the general environment. Just as wc arc able to read and to recognize shapes under the most varied conditions, so arc frogs able to scc their prey and to fccd upon it under the bright light of midday or under the twilight of morning or evening, whether this bc in their natural environment or in a small cage in the laboratory. How is this accomplished? How do frogs recognize the universals, prey and enemy? To survive, a frog needs to react rapidly, either to catch a prey or to escape an enemy. To do this, the pat tern of light and dark that is the original image formed on the retina has to be anaJyzed, sooner or later, to select from it the features which define the universals. In these circumstances we can ask: Does the retina perform an analysis and abstract the meaningful parameters that will permit the recognition of the universals or is this analysis performed only later in the visual centers? Any
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina.
Barlow, H. B., & Levick, W. R. (1965) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007638 · Cited by 1,576
The Major Cell Populations of the Mouse Retina
Jeon, C.-J., Strettoi, E., & Masland, R. H. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-21-08936.1998 · Cited by 1,429
Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording.
Werblin, F. S., & Dowling, J. E. (1969) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1969.32.3.339 · Cited by 1,381
The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys
Daniel, P. M., & Whitteridge, D. (1961) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006803 · Cited by 1,147
Metadata
- Authors
- Maturana, H. R., Lettvin, J. Y., McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of General Physiology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1960-07-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 129-175
- ISSN
- 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7748
- OpenAlex
- W2166025442
- Cited by
- 819
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomy and Physiology of Vision in the Frog (Rana pipiens). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.43.6.129
- The paper
- Maturana, H. R., Lettvin, J. Y., McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. H. (1960). Anatomy and Physiology of Vision in the Frog (Rana pipiens). The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.43.6.129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.