Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 819

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anatomy and Physiology of Vision in the Frog (Rana pipiens)

Open access
Maturana, Humberto R., Lettvin, J. Y., McCulloch, W. S., Pitts, W. H.·1960·The Journal of General Physiology

Abstract

Frogs arc essentially dependent on vision. They fccd on worms, flies, and other insects which they catch directly with the mouth or by striking them with the tongue; for this they use only visual clues. Furthermore, frogs prey only on moving insects, and their attention is never attracted by stationary creatures or objects. Nor do they respond with feeding behavior to a large moving object, instead it provokes an escape reaction. For them, a form deprived of movement SCClnS to bc behaviorally meaningless. Frogs, then, appear to recognize their prey and select it for attack from among all other environmental objects because it exhibits a number of features such as movement, a certain size, some contrast, and, perhaps, also a certain color. Furthermore, this ability of frogs to recognize their prey and to snap at it is not altered by changes in the general environment. Just as wc arc able to read and to recognize shapes under the most varied conditions, so arc frogs able to scc their prey and to fccd upon it under the bright light of midday or under the twilight of morning or evening, whether this bc in their natural environment or in a small cage in the laboratory. How is this accomplished? How do frogs recognize the universals, prey and enemy? To survive, a frog needs to react rapidly, either to catch a prey or to escape an enemy. To do this, the pat tern of light and dark that is the original image formed on the retina has to be anaJyzed, sooner or later, to select from it the features which define the universals. In these circumstances we can ask: Does the retina perform an analysis and abstract the meaningful parameters that will permit the recognition of the universals or is this analysis performed only later in the visual centers? Any

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1085/jgp.43.6.129

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 819

Metadata

Authors
Maturana, H. R., Lettvin, J. Y., McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. H.
Venue
The Journal of General Physiology
Published
1960-07-01
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
129-175
ISSN
  • 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7748
OpenAlex
W2166025442
Cited by
819
References
0
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomy and Physiology of Vision in the Frog (Rana pipiens). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.43.6.129
The paper
Maturana, H. R., Lettvin, J. Y., McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. H. (1960). Anatomy and Physiology of Vision in the Frog (Rana pipiens). The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.43.6.129

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.