Cited by 1,147Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys

Open access
Daniel, P. M., Whitteridge, D.·1961·The Journal of Physiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006803

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daniel, P. M., & Whitteridge, D.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1961-12
Volume
159
Issue
2
Pages
203-221
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2081360048
Cited by
1,147
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
visual field representation, cerebral cortex, visual cortex, cortical mapping, monkeys, visual perception
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Cerebral Cortex, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review