Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Changes in Membrane Properties of Chick Embryonic Hearts during Development

Open access
Sperelakis, Nick, Shigenobu, K.·1972·The Journal of General Physiology

Abstract

The electrophysiological properties of embryonic chick hearts (ventricles) change during development; the largest changes occur between days 2 and 8. Resting potential (Em) and peak overshoot potential (+Emax) increase, respectively, from -35 mv and +11 mv at day 2 to -70 mv and +28 mv at days 12–21. Action potential duration does not change significantly. Maximum rate of rise of the action potential (+Vmax) increases from about 20 v/sec at days 2–3 to 150 v/sec at days 18–21; + Vmax of young cells is not greatly increased by applied hyperpolarizing current pulses. In resting Em vs. log [K+]o curves, the slope at high K+ is lower in young hearts (e.g. 30 mv/decade) than the 50–60 mv/decade obtained in old hearts, but the extrapolated [K+]i values (125–140 mM) are almost as high. Input resistance is much higher in young hearts (13 MΩ at day 2 vs. 4.5 MΩ at days 8–21), suggesting that the membrane resistivity (Rm) is higher. The ratio of permeabilities, PNa/PK, is high (about 0.2) in young hearts, due to a low PK, and decreases during ontogeny (to about 0.05). The low K+ conductance (gK) in young hearts accounts for the greater incidence of hyperpolarizing afterpotentials and pacemaker potentials, the lower sensitivity (with respect to loss of excitability) to elevation of [K+]o, and the higher chronaxie. Acetylcholine does not increase gK of young or old ventricular cells. The increase in (Na+, K+)-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) activity during development tends to compensate for the increase in gK. +Emax and + Vmax are dependent on [Na+]o in both young and old hearts. However, the Na+ channels in young hearts (2–4 days) are slow, tetrodotoxin (TTX)-insensitive, and activated-inactivated at lower Em. In contrast, the Na+ channels of cells in older hearts (> 8 days) are fast and TTX-sensitive, but they revert back to slow channels when placed in culture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1085/jgp.60.4.430

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Sperelakis, N., & Shigenobu, K.
Venue
The Journal of General Physiology
Published
1972-10-01
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
430-453
ISSN
  • 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7748
OpenAlex
W2039530429
Cited by
168
References
0
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in Membrane Properties of Chick Embryonic Hearts during Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.60.4.430
The paper
Sperelakis, N., & Shigenobu, K. (1972). Changes in Membrane Properties of Chick Embryonic Hearts during Development. The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.60.4.430

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.