The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Range of Attractant Concentrations for Bacterial Chemotaxis and the Threshold and Size of Response over This Range
Open accessAbstract
Attractant was added to a suspension of bacteria (the background concentration of attractant) and then these bacteria were exposed to a yet higher concentration of attractant in a capillary. Chemotaxis was measured by determining how many bacteria accumulated in the capillary. The response range for chemotaxis lies between the threshold concentration and the saturating concentration. The breadth of this range is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. Attractants detected by the same chemoreceptor can have their response ranges in widely different places. Over the center of the response range (on a logarithmic scale), bacteria give similar sized responses to similar fractional increases of concentration, i.e. they respond to ratios of attractant concentration, but the response peaks at the center of the range. The size of the response is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. For a detectable response, a smaller increase in attractant concentration is needed for attractants detected by some chemoreceptors than for attractants detected by others. Although the data are inadequate, it appears that the Weber law may be observed over a wide range of concentrations for some attractants but not for others. In the Appendix we aim to explain some of these results in terms of the interaction of an attractant with its chemoreceptor according to the law of mass action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Berg, H. C., & Purcell, E. M. (1977) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(77)85544-6 · Cited by 1,758
Adler, J. (1975) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.44.070175.002013 · Cited by 522
Self-citationA sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis
Mao, H., Cremer, P. S., & Manson, M. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0931258100 · Cited by 332
Greenfield, D., McEvoy, A. L., Shroff, H., Crooks, G. E., Wingreen, N. S., Betzig, E., & Liphardt, J. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000137 · Cited by 328
Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli
Tu, Y., Shimizu, T. S., & Berg, H. C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0807569105 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Mesibov, R., Ordal, G. W., & Adler, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of General Physiology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1973-08-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-223
- ISSN
- 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7748
- OpenAlex
- W2073007383
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Range of Attractant Concentrations for Bacterial Chemotaxis and the Threshold and Size of Response over This Range. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.62.2.203
- The paper
- Mesibov, R., Ordal, G. W., & Adler, J. (1973). The Range of Attractant Concentrations for Bacterial Chemotaxis and the Threshold and Size of Response over This Range. The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.62.2.203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.