The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Potassium channels as multi-ion single-file pores.
Abstract
A literature review reveals many lines of evidence that both delayed rectifier and inward rectifier potassium channels are multi-ion pores. These include unidirectional flux ratios given by the 2--2.5 power of the electrochemical activity ratio, very steeply voltage-dependent block with monovalent blocking ions, relief of block by permeant ions added to the side opposite from the blocking ion, rectification depending on E--EK, and a minimum in the reversal potential or conductance as external K+ ions are replaced by an equivalent concentration of T1+ ions. We consider a channel with a linear sequence of energy barriers and binding sites. The channel can be occupied by more than one ion at a time, and ions hop in single file into vacant sites with rate constants that depend on barrier heights, membrane potential, and interionic repulsion. Such multi-ion models reproduce qualitatively the special flux properties of potassium channels when the barriers for hopping out of the pore are larger than for hopping between sites within the pore and when there is repulsion between ions. These conditions also produce multiple maxima in the conductance-ion activity relationship. In agreement with Armstrong's hypothesis (1969. J. Gen. Physiol. 54:553--575), inward rectification may be understood in terms of block by an internal blocking cation. Potassium channels must have at least three sites and often contain at least two ions at a time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The channel might display multi-ion conduction phenomena akin to those long-known in K+ channels.
“The channel might therefore display multi-ion conduction phenomena akin to those long-known in K+ channels25,26.”
From Crystal structures of a double-barrelled fluoride ion channel (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Davis, M. J., Earley, S., Li, Y.-S., & Chien, S. (2023) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00053.2021 · Cited by 273
Great Metalloclusters in Enzymology
Rees, D. C. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135406 · Cited by 220
Crystal structures of a double-barrelled fluoride ion channel
Stockbridge, R. B., Kolmakova-Partensky, L., Shane, T., Koide, A., Koide, S., Miller, C., & Newstead, S. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14981 · Cited by 119
Vitamin A Transport Mechanism of the Multitransmembrane Cell-Surface Receptor STRA6
Kawaguchi, R., Zhong, M., Kassai, M., Ter-Stepanian, M., & Sun, H. (2015) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes5030425 · Cited by 75
Membrane exporters of fluoride ion
McIlwain, B. C., Ruprecht, M. T., & Stockbridge, R. B. (2021) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-071520-112507 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Hille, B., & Schwarz, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of general physiology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1978-10-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-442
- ISSN
- 0022-1295
- 1540-7748
- PMC
- PMC2228548
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review