The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lidocaine block of cardiac sodium channels.
Open accessAbstract
Lidocaine block of cardiac sodium channels was studied in voltage-clamped rabbit purkinje fibers at drug concentrations ranging from 1 mM down to effective antiarrhythmic doses (5-20 muM). Dose-response curves indicated that lidocaine blocks the channel by binding one-to-one, with a voltage-dependent K(d). The half-blocking concentration varied from more than 300 muM, at a negative holding potential where inactivation was completely removed, to approximately 10 muM, at a depolarized holding potential where inactivation was nearly complete. Lidocaine block showed prominent use dependence with trains of depolarizing pulses from a negative holding potential. During the interval between pulses, repriming of I (Na) displayed two exponential components, a normally recovering component (tauless than 0.2 s), and a lidocaine-induced, slowly recovering fraction (tau approximately 1-2 s at pH 7.0). Raising the lidocaine concentration magnified the slowly recovering fraction without changing its time course; after a long depolarization, this fraction was one-half at approximately 10 muM lidocaine, just as expected if it corresponded to drug-bound, inactivated channels. At less than or equal to 20 muM lidocaine, the slowly recovering fraction grew exponentially to a steady level as the preceding depolarization was prolonged; the time course was the same for strong or weak depolarizations, that is, with or without significant activation of I(Na). This argues that use dependence at therapeutic levels reflects block of inactivated channels, rather than block of open channels. Overall, these results provide direct evidence for the "modulated-receptor hypothesis" of Hille (1977) and Hondeghem and Katzung (1977). Unlike tetrodotoxin, lidocaine shows similar interactions with Na channels of heart, nerve, and skeletal muscle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resurgence of sodium channel research
Goldin, A. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.871 · Cited by 688
Roy, M., & Narahashi, T. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-06-02104.1992 · Cited by 533
Mechanisms of arrhythmogenic delayed and early afterdepolarizations in ferret ventricular muscle.
Marban, E., Robinson, S. W., & Wier, W. G. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci112701 · Cited by 316
Common modes of drug action on Na+ channels: local anesthetics, antiarrhythmics and anticonvulsants
Catterall, W. A. (1987) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0165-6147(87)90011-3 · Cited by 289
Structure and Pharmacology of Voltage-Gated Sodium and Calcium Channels
Catterall, W. A., Lenaeus, M. J., & Gamal El-Din, T. M. (2020) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021757 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Bean, B. P., Cohen, C. J., & Tsien, R. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of general physiology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1983-05-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 613-642
- ISSN
- 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7748
- OpenAlex
- W2115052737
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lidocaine block of cardiac sodium channels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.81.5.613
- The paper
- Bean, B. P., Cohen, C. J., & Tsien, R. W. (1983). Lidocaine block of cardiac sodium channels. The Journal of general physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.81.5.613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.