The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Small eccentricities or inclinations in the Brouwer theory of the artificial satellite
Abstract
Brouwer's theory of the artificial satellite is re-examined for small eccentricities and inclinations and im- proved formulas are obtained. The validity of the new formulas is confirmed by comparison with the results of numerical integration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Revisiting Spacetrack Report #3
Vallado, D., Crawford, P., Hujsak, R., & Kelso, T. S. (2006) · AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.2006-6753 · Cited by 440
J2 Invariant Relative Orbits for Spacecraft Formations
Schaub, H., & Alfriend, K. T. (2001) · Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy · doi:10.1023/a:1011161811472 · Cited by 347
Tisaev, M., Ferrato, E., Giannetti, V., Paissoni, C., Baresi, N., Lucca Fabris, A., & Andreussi, T. (2022) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.11.011 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyddane, R. H.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1963-10
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 555
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997114680
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small eccentricities or inclinations in the Brouwer theory of the artificial satellite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/109179
- The paper
- Lyddane, R. H. (1963). Small eccentricities or inclinations in the Brouwer theory of the artificial satellite. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/109179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.