The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting Spacetrack Report #3
Abstract
Over a quarter century ago, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) released the equations and source code used to predict satellite positions through SpaceTrack Report Number 3 (STR#3). Because the DoD's two-line element sets (TLEs) were the only source of orbital data, widely available through NASA, this code became commonplace among users needing accurate results. However, end users made code changes to correct the implementation of the equations and to handle rare cases encountered in operations. These changes migrated into numerous new versions and compiled programs outside the DoD. Changes made to the original STR#3 code have not been released in a comprehensive form to the public, so the code available to the public no longer matches the code used by DoD to produce the TLEs. Fortunately, independent efforts, technical papers, and source code enabled us to synthesize a non-proprietary version which we believe is up-to-date and accurate. This paper provides source code, test cases, results, and analysis of a version of SGP4 theory designed to be highly compatible with recent DoD versions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NASA Technical Memorandum 84562
Nonlinearanalysisof, G., & Bondedjoints, A. (1982) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 1,940
Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications
Vallado, D. (1997) · Cited by 1,540
Self-citationFundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications
Melton, R. G. (1998) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/2.4291 · Cited by 1,197
Solution of the problem of artificial satellite theory without drag
Brouwer, D. (1959) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/107958 · Cited by 858
Revised Static Models of the Thermosphere and Exosphere with Empirical Temperature Profiles
Jacchia, L. G. (1971) · SAO Special Report · Cited by 578
The motion of a close earth satellite
Kozai, Y. (1959) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/107957 · Cited by 506
Models for Propagation of NORAD Element Sets
Hoots, F. R., & Roehrich, R. L. (1980) · doi:10.21236/ada093554 · Cited by 426
GAMER, C. (1973) · The Musical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/mq/lix.3.462 · Cited by 283
Small eccentricities or inclinations in the Brouwer theory of the artificial satellite
Lyddane, R. H. (1963) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/109179 · Cited by 181
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference
(2016) · doi:10.2514/mast16 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Liu, C., Kirchengast, G., Sun, Y., Proschek, V., Wang, X., Tian, L., Du, Q., Bai, W., Wu, C., Hu, P., et al. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13234849 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Vallado, D., Crawford, P., Hujsak, R., & Kelso, T. S.
- Venue
- AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit
- Published
- 2006-06-15
- OpenAlex
- W2313522595
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting Spacetrack Report #3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2514/6.2006-6753
- The paper
- Vallado, D., Crawford, P., Hujsak, R., & Kelso, T. S. (2006). Revisiting Spacetrack Report #3. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.