The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A survey for circumstellar disks around young stellar objects
Abstract
Continuum observations at 1.3 mm of 86 pre-main sequence stars in the Taurus-Auriga dark clouds show that 42% have detectable emission from small particles. The detected fraction is only slightly smaller for the weak-line and "naked" T Tauri stars than for classical T Tauris, indicating that the former stars often have circumstellar material. In both categories, the column densities of particles are too large to be compatible with spherical distributions of circumstellar matter -- the optical extinctions would be too large; the particles are almost certainly in spatially thin, circumstellar disks. Models of the spectral energy distributions from 10 to 1300 μm indicate that for the most part the disks are transparent at 1.3 mm, although the innermost (≪1 AU) regions are opaque even at millimeter wavelenths. The aggregate particle masses are between 10-5 and 10-2 M⊙. The disk mass does not decrease with increasing stellar age up to at least 107 years among the stars detected at 1.3 mm. There is some evidence for temperature evolution, in the sense that older disks are colder and less luminous. There is little correlation between disk mass and Hα equivalent width among the detected stars, suggesting that the Hα line is not by itself indicative of disk mass. Spectral indices for several sources between 1.3 and 2.7 mm suggest that the particle emissivities ɛ are weaker functions of frequency ν than is the usual case of interstellar grains. Particle growth via adhesion in the dense disks might explain this result. The typical disk has an angular momentum comparable to that generally accepted for the early solar nebula, but very little stored energy, almost five orders of magnitude smaller than that of the central star. Our results demonstrate that disks more massive than the minimum mass of the proto-solar system commonly accompany the birth of solar-mass stars and suggest that planetary systems are common in the Galaxy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protoplanetary Disks and Their Evolution
Williams, J. P., & Cieza, L. A. (2011) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102548 · Cited by 1,403
Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi to its present location
Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380606a0 · Cited by 1,235
Protoplanetary disk structures in Ophiuchus
Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Qi, C., & Dullemond, C. P. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1502 · Cited by 709
Meeus, G., Waters, L. B. F. M., Bouwman, J., van den Ancker, M. E., Waelkens, C., & Malfait, K. (2001) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000144 · Cited by 567
Can Giant Planets Form by Direct Gravitational Instability?
Rafikov, R. R. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428899 · Cited by 433
Metadata
- Authors
- Beckwith, S. V. W., Sargent, A. I., Chini, R. S., & Guesten, R.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 924
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014488392
- Cited by
- 1,589
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey for circumstellar disks around young stellar objects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/115385
- The paper
- Beckwith, S. V. W., Sargent, A. I., Chini, R. S., & Guesten, R. (1990). A survey for circumstellar disks around young stellar objects. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/115385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.