Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 664

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Palomar/MSU Nearby-Star Spectroscopic Survey. I. The Northern M Dwarfs -Bandstrengths and Kinematics

Reid, I. Neill, Hawley, Suzanne L., Gizis, John E.·1995·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

The Third Catalogue of Nearby Stars (Gliese & Jahreiss Preliminary Version of the third Catalogue of Nearby Stars, 1991) includes over 1850 stars which lie north of δ 30° and are either identified as spectral type M, or are unclassified but with an absolute visual magnitude estimate MV>+8.O. Although there is no uniformity in selection criteria, and many of the stars lack basic data (radial velocities, spectral types, accurate photometry), the observational properties of these stars underlie most estimates of the fundamental characteristics of the Galactic Disk. We have obtained optical spectroscopy of 1746 of the 1876 stars-the remaining 130 are binary companions of brighter stars and inaccessible to our observations. These spectra allow us, first, to exclude 61 stars as either degenerates or as misclassified earlier-type (B - K) stars lying beyond the 25 pc limit; to establish radial velocities accurate to ±10 km s-1 for all stars confirmed as late-type dwarfs; to determine spectral types and absolute magnitudes from the TiO bandstrength, allowing more accurate distance estimates for stars with inaccurate (or no) trigonometric parallax measurements; and to identify stars with Ha emission (chromospherically active stars) and with strong CaH absorption (perhaps including some metal-poor disk subdwarfs). We have determined the nearby-star luminosity function from complete samples derived by applying both the distance limits defined by Wielen (1974) and by using limits derived from our own analysis. In both cases, we find good agreement with Wielen's results to MV ∼+11, but lower densities at the maximum (MV∼+12). The latter analysis results in a luminosity function, ΦCNS, which closely matches photometric parallax analyses for MV<+11 and MV>+14 -- we do not recover the apparent excess of low-luminosity stars inferred from analysis of the 5 pc sample. However, ΦCNS does lie below Φphot at the peak (MV∼12), and we suggest that this offset is caused by the inclusion of unrecognized binaries in the photometric surveys. We have also reanalyzed the local stellar kinematics using the complete sample and find that the velocity distributions show significant departures from single Gaussian velocity dispersions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/117655

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 664

Metadata

Authors
Reid, I. N., Hawley, S. L., & Gizis, J. E.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
1995-10
Volume
110
Pages
1838
ISSN
0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079581806
Cited by
664
References
0
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Palomar/MSU Nearby-Star Spectroscopic Survey. I. The Northern M Dwarfs -Bandstrengths and Kinematics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/117655
The paper
Reid, I. N., Hawley, S. L., & Gizis, J. E. (1995). The Palomar/MSU Nearby-Star Spectroscopic Survey. I. The Northern M Dwarfs -Bandstrengths and Kinematics. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/117655

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.