The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Palomar Distant Clusters Survey. I. The Cluster Catalog
Open accessAbstract
We present an optical/near-IR selected catalog of 79 clusters distributed over an area of 5.1^deg^ sq. The catalog was constructed from images obtained with the 4-Shooter CCD mosaic camera on the Hale 5 m telescope operating in "scan" mode. The survey, hereafter known as the Palomar distant cluster survey (PDCS), was conducted in two broadband filters that closely resemble V and I. The 4 σ limiting magnitudes for our 300 s exposures are ~23.8(V) and 22.5 (I). A matched filter algorithm was developed and employed to identify the cluster candidates by using positional and photometric data simultaneously. The clusters cover the range 0.2 <~ z <~ 1.2, based on the redshift estimates derived in the cluster detection procedure. An accurate selection function is generated from extensive simulations. We find that the cumulative surface density of clusters with richness class R => 1 is about a factor of 5 higher than the extrapolated density of R => 1 Abell clusters. The PDCS results are consistent with a constant comoving density of clusters to z <~ 0.6, albeit at the above high density level. Constraints on cluster abundances at z > 0.6 will be possible with the acquisition of spectroscopic redshifts for a large subset of these cluster candidates. We also present a supplemental catalog of 28 clusters that do not satisfy all our selection criteria but which include some of the most distant systems detected in the survey. Finding charts for all 107 cluster candidates are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE SECOND-GENERATION GUIDE STAR CATALOG: DESCRIPTION AND PROPERTIES
Lasker, B. M., Lattanzi, M. G., McLean, B. J., Bucciarelli, B., Drimmel, R., Garcia, J., Greene, G., Guglielmetti, F., Hanley, C., Hawkins, G., et al. (2008) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/2/735 · Cited by 543
The Evolution of X-Ray Clusters of Galaxies
Rosati, P., Borgani, S., & Norman, C. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.120401.150547 · Cited by 482
A halo-based galaxy group finder: calibration and application to the 2dFGRS
Yang, X., Mo, H. J., van den Bosch, F. C., & Jing, Y. P. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08560.x · Cited by 444
Na, Al, and O Abundances of Open Clusters NGC 7142, NGC 6939, and IC 4756
Jacobson, H. R., Friel, E. D., & Pilachowski, C. A. (2007) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/520927 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Postman, M., Lubin, L. M., Gunn, J. E., Oke, J. B., Hoessel, J. G., Schneider, D. P., & Christensen, J. A.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 615
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2950654967
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Palomar Distant Clusters Survey. I. The Cluster Catalog. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/117811
- The paper
- Postman, M., Lubin, L. M., Gunn, J. E., Oke, J. B., Hoessel, J. G., Schneider, D. P., & Christensen, J. A. (1996). The Palomar Distant Clusters Survey. I. The Cluster Catalog. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/117811
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.