Institutional productivities
Open accessAbstract
We considered the 5707 research papers published in ApJ, AJ, and PASP in 1952, 1962, 1972, 1982, and 1992. For each paper we noted the affiliations and, assuming that each of n authors should get credit for one n -1 paper for his/her institution, we determined the numbers of ppaers published by 38 pre-selected institutions, the remaining other U.S. institutions, and non-U.S. institutions. The 10 or 20 most productive institutions are listed for each year. In many cases the institutions with the largest staffs are at the top of the lists. Then we determined the numbers of AAs members at each institution and computed the mean numbers of papers per AAS member. We found that pure research organizations have the highest productivity per AAS member and average decrease as we progress to institituions whose staff members have many other than commitments in addition to research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sheer size of an article influences whether it is cited, as longer articles have more content that can be cited than shorter articles do.
“as longer articles have more content that can be cited than shorter articles do, the sheer size of an article influences whether it is cited”
From What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008) · cites this paper as Abt, 1993
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410810844150 · Cited by 1,607 · see citing works
Ivanović, L., & Ho, Y. (2017) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2017.1415297 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20531 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Ivanović, D., & Ho, Y. (2014) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/0961000614537514 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Rashid, S., Khattak, A. N., Ashiq, M., Rehman, S. U., & Rasool, M. R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9020017 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Diffusing through Disciplines: Insiders, Outsiders, and Socially Influenced Citation Behavior
Lynn, F. B. (2014) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sou069 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Using clustering strategies for creating authority files
French, J. C., Powell, A. L., & Schulman, E. (2000) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(2000)51:8 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Makino, J. (1998) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02458398 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
A Scientometric Analysis of Forty-Three Years of Research in Social Support in Education (1977–2020)
Rashid, S., Rehman, S. U., Ashiq, M., & Khattak, A. N. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11040149 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Publication patterns of Turkish astronomers
Uzun, A., & Özel, M. E. (1996) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02093492 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Automating the construction of authority files in digital libraries: A case study
French, J. C., Powell, A. L., Schulman, E., & Pfaltz, J. L. (1997) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026721 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Uzun, A. (2002) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1014864827441 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
ERDOĞMUŞ, C., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2022) · International Online Journal of Primary Education · doi:10.55020/iojpe.1083925 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Jiang, J., Woosnam, K. M., & Draper, J. (2014) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2014.06.004 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
What can we Learn from Publication Studies?
Abt, H. A. (2000) · Astrophysics and space science library · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0926-3_4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationA Study on the Citation Behavior by Academic Background of Researchers
Oh, Y., Oh, H.-J., Kim, C.-H., & Kim, Y. (2016) · Journal of the Korean Society for information Management · doi:10.3743/kosim.2016.33.1.247 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Updated Bibliography of Socio-Astronomy
Heck, A. (2001) · Astrophysics and space science library · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0666-8_19
Updated Bibliography of Socio-Astronomy
Heck, A. (2002) · Astrophysics and space science library · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0606-4_18
- Authors
- Abt, H. A.
- Affiliations
- Kitt Peak National Observatory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Abt, Helmut A.
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 794
- ISSN
- 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3873
- OpenAlex
- W4244927281
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- institutional productivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review