The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attaining Doppler Precision of 3 M s-1
Open accessAbstract
Current spectroscopic techniques yield Doppler-shift errors of 10 to 50 m s -1 , barely adequate to detect reflex velocities caused by Jupiter-like and lower-mass planets. We describe a technique which yields relative radial velocity errors of 3 m s -1 . This technique makes use of a fast echelle spectrograph at resolution of R=62,000 and a large format CCD which acquires the entire visible and near IR spectrum in each exposure. Starlight is sent through an iodine absorption cell placed at the spectrometer entrance slit. The resulting superimposed iodine lines provide a fiducial wavelength scale against which to measure radial velocity shifts. The shapes of iodine lines convey the PSF of the spectrometer to account for changes in spectrometer optics and illumination on all times scales. We construct a model of each observed spectrum by multiplying a stellar spectrum with an iodine spectrum and convolving the result with the spectrometer PSF. The free parameters of the model include the wavelength scale, spectrometer PSF, and stellar Doppler shift. All model parameters are derived anew for each exposure and the synthesis is done on a grid of CCD sub-pixels, using spline functions as interpolation predictors. We present Doppler tests of the Sun, Tau Ceti, and 107 Psc, observed with the Lick and Keck echelles. All exhibit apparent errors of about 3 m s -1 , maintained on time scales of minutes to a year. This precision agrees with the theoretically predicted errors that stem primarily from photon statistics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Transiting “51 Peg–like” Planet
Henry, G. W., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Vogt, S. S. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312458 · Cited by 964
Self-citationButler, R. P., Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Vogt, S. S., Tinney, C. G., Jones, H. R. A., Carter, B. D., Johnson, J. A., McCarthy, C., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/504701 · Cited by 914
Self-citationOBLIQUITIES OF HOT JUPITER HOST STARS: EVIDENCE FOR TIDAL INTERACTIONS AND PRIMORDIAL MISALIGNMENTS
Albrecht, S., Winn, J. N., Johnson, J. A., Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., Arriagada, P., Crane, J. D., Shectman, S. A., Thompson, I. B., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/18 · Cited by 664
Self-citationState of the Field: Extreme Precision Radial Velocities
Fischer, D. A., Anglada-Escude, G., Arriagada, P., Baluev, R. V., Bean, J. L., Bouchy, F., Buchhave, L. A., Carroll, T., Chakraborty, A., Crepp, J. R., et al. (2016) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/964/066001 · Cited by 367
Detection Limits from the McDonald Observatory Planet Search Program
Wittenmyer, R. A., Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., Hatzes, A. P., Walker, G. A. H., Yang, S. L. S., & Paulson, D. B. (2006) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/504942 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., McCarthy, C., Dosanjh, P., & Vogt, S. S.
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 108
- Pages
- 500
- ISSN
- 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3873
- OpenAlex
- W1985601475
- Cited by
- 1,160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attaining Doppler Precision of 3 M s-1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/133755
- The paper
- Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., McCarthy, C., Dosanjh, P., & Vogt, S. S. (1996). Attaining Doppler Precision of 3 M s-1. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/133755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.