The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. II.
Abstract
In this paper the theory recently developed by the writer for the analysis of counts of the extra- galactic nebulae in terms of a fluctuating density field has been applied to the counts obtained by Shane and Wirtanen at the Lick Observatory. The observational data have been reduced to the forms required for this analysis, and the corresponding theoretical functions have been obtained for several sets of values for the parameters involved. The comparison of the theory with the observations indicates that the effects of fluctuations in the absorption within our own Galaxy can be neglected in a first approximation; further, the theoretical expectations for the case in which there is a dispersion of 2 mag. in the absolute magnitudes of the nebulae are found to be in best accord with the observations. The mean square of the deviations in the space density of the nebulae from the mean is found to be about twenty-five times the square of the mean density. The value for the microscale, ro, characterixing the "eddy" distribution of the nebulae and the value for the mean density of the nebulae in space, p, are both dependent upon the particular values used for the limiting apparent magnitude of the counts, rn , the mean absolute magnitude of the nebulae, M1, and the optical half-thickness of the galaxy, ri/1 for given values of these quantities it is shown how the corresponding values of r and p can be deduced on the basis of the theory. From a straightforward analysis of the counts as they are given, the value ri/I = 0.76 is obtained. If this value is taken as that which is appropriate to the observational material and if the best available values for rn'1 and M1 are used, it is found that r = 3.0 X 106 parsecs and p = 6.0 X 10-19 nebulae per cubic parsec.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Alarcon, A., Aleksić, J., Allam, S., Allen, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043526 · Cited by 1,213
Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
Hu, W., & Dodelson, S. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926 · Cited by 745
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449
Planck 2013 results. XVII. Gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Armitage-Caplan, C., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Atrio-Barandela, F., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., et al. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321543 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Limber, D. N.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1954-05
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 655
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2088111938
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. II. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/145870
- The paper
- Limber, D. N. (1954). The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. II. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/145870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.