The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the gravitational stability of a disk of stars
Abstract
This paper considers the question of the large-scale gravitational stability of an arbitrary, highly flattened stellar system, which is assumed initially to rotate in approximate equilibrium between its self-gravitation and the centrifugal forces. It is concluded that no such disk, if fairly smooth or uniform, can be entirely stable against a tendency to form massive condensations within its own plane, unless the root-mean-square random velocities of its constituents, in the directions parallel to that plane, are everywhere sufficiently large. Lacking such random motions, it is shown that the system must be vulnerable to numerous unstable disturbances, the dimensions of which may approach its over-all radius, and whose times of growth are to be reckoned in fractions of the typical periods of revolution. The minimum root-mean-square radial velocity dispersion required in any one vicinity for the complete suppression of all axisymmetric instabilities is calculated (in collaboration with A. Kalnajs) as 3.36 G /K, where G is the gravitational constant, and and K are the local values of the projected stellar density and the epicyclic frequency, respectively. From that, and the observed j# and K, together with their uncertainties, this minimum for the solar neighborhood of our Galaxy is estimated to fall between 20 and 35 k /sec, a range which indeed encompasses the actual radial velocity dispersions of the most predominant types of stars in our vicinity. It is pointed out that both this curious agreement, and also the well-known discrepancy between the z- and r-velocity dispersions at least of the older disk stars, may be explainable in terms of past instabilities of this galactic disk.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Q > 1 is typically taken to represent disks stable to gravitational collapse.”
From A Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation (2022) · cites this paper as Toomre 1964
In the citing paper
“The excitation of eccentricities elevates radial velocity dispersions above critical values that would cause gravitational instabilities (Toomre 1964) and hinders the accretion of moons.”
From A Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation (2022) · cites this paper as Toomre 1964
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,004 of 1,004
Direct Evidence for Gravitational Instability and Moonlet Formation in Saturn's Rings
Beurle, K., Murray, C. D., Williams, G. A., Evans, M. W., Cooper, N. J., & Agnor, C. B. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/718/2/l176 · Cited by 43
“Note that this is equivalent to the conditions specified by the Toomre parameter (Toomre 1964; Karjalainen & Salo 2004; Lewis & Stewart 2009) frequently used in the context of stability in disks.3 3 The Toomre stability parameter (Q = vΩ/πGΣ, where Σ and v are the disk’s surface density and…”
MethodSgr A* envelope explosion and the young stars in the centre of the Milky Way
Nayakshin, S., & Zubovas, K. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly082 · Cited by 12
“(2) Note that Qsh = QT/(2π), where QT is the Toomre (1964) parameter for a gas disc with same values of Σ and cs, so the collapse of the shell requires somewhat similar conditions albeit in a very different geometry.”
BackgroundA Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation
Sutton, P. J., Albery, B., & Muff, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2022.819933 · Cited by 2
“The excitation of eccentricities elevates radial velocity dispersions above critical values that would cause gravitational instabilities (Toomre 1964) and hinders the accretion of moons.”
BackgroundOn the Tidal Environment of an Outwardly Migrating F Ring
Sutton, P. J. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty995 · Cited by 2
“A differentially rotating disk will experience gravitational instabilities when the Toomre parameter 𝑄 ≤ 1 (Toomre 1964).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Toomre, A.
- Corresponding author
- Toomre, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1964-05
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 1217
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2035547408
- Cited by
- 3,349
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 98 · 2025: 153 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 178 · 2017: 153 · 2016: 187 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 109 · 2012: 116
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- gravitational stability, stellar disks, axisymmetric instability, velocity dispersion, epicyclic frequencies, Galactic disk, solar neighborhood, disk stars
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review