Cited by 43Astro and Planetary ScienceSpace Satellite Systems and ControlAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Direct Evidence for Gravitational Instability and Moonlet Formation in Saturn's Rings

Open access
Beurle, K., Murray, C. D., Williams, G. A., Evans, M. W., Cooper, N. J., Agnor, C. B.·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

New images from the Cassini spacecraft reveal optically thick clumps, capable of casting shadows, and associated structures in regions of Saturn's F ring that have recently experienced close passage by the adjacent moon Prometheus. Using these images and modeling, we show that Prometheus' perturbations create regions of enhanced density and low relative velocity that are susceptible to gravitational instability and the formation of distended, yet long-lived, gravitationally coherent clumps. Subsequent collisional damping of these low-density clumps may facilitate their collapse into ∼10–20 km contiguous moonlets. The observed behavior of the F ring is analogous to the case of a marginally stable gas disk being driven to instability and collapse via perturbations from an embedded gas giant planet.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2041-8205/718/2/l176

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar System Dynamics (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 158
  2. Williams, G. A. 2009, PhD thesis, Queen Mary Univ. of London

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beurle, K., Murray, C. D., Williams, G. A., Evans, M. W., Cooper, N. J., & Agnor, C. B.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Murray, C. D.
  • Agnor, C. B.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-07-14
Volume
718
Issue
2
Pages
L176-L180
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W1972262640
Cited by
43
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/F002696/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
moonlets, gravitational instability, Prometheus, ring perturbations, collisional damping, ring dynamics, Cassini imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review