Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 690

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Parameter estimation in X-ray astronomy

Lampton, M., Margon, B., Bowyer, S.·1976·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Two important problems encountered in X-ray astronomy are considered: the assessment of the validity of models, and the determination of values of adjustable parameters which valid models possess. Minimization of the chi-squared statistic is recommended for testing the validity of classes of models. The chi-squared min + 1 error estimation method is evaluated and found to be unsuitable when several parameter ranges are to be derived. The ratio of variances method gives parameter confidence regions which are more variable than necessary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/154592

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 690

Metadata

Authors
Lampton, M., Margon, B., & Bowyer, S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1976-08
Volume
208
Pages
177
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1977503055
Cited by
690
References
0
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parameter estimation in X-ray astronomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/154592
The paper
Lampton, M., Margon, B., & Bowyer, S. (1976). Parameter estimation in X-ray astronomy. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/154592

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.