The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Position measurement with a resolution and noise-limited instrument
Abstract
A common problem in experimental data analysis is to locate the position of a signal to an accuracy which is substantially less than the actual signal width. By applying maximum likelihood estimation to this problem, this paper derives theoretical limits on the ability to locate signal position. The limiting error in position measurement is shown to be a simple function of the instrument resolution, the density of sample points, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the data. An interesting conclusion is that position information on a much finer scale than the minimum instrument sampling interval is contained in data of modest signal-to-noise ratio. The common procedure of excluding the portion of the data lying below an amplitude threshold to guard against background fluctuations is incorporated in the maximum likelihood analysis. It is shown that selection of the optimum amplitude threshold level depends on the type of noise present in the data, and can be an important factor in position accuracy. The analytical results exhibit close agreement with Monte Carlo simulations of position accuracy in the presence of noise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mathematical Methods in Physics
(2000) · doi:10.1142/4401 · Cited by 819
Parameter estimation in X-ray astronomy
Lampton, M., Margon, B., & Bowyer, S. (1976) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/154592 · Cited by 690
Radiometry and the detection of optical radiation
Boyd, R. W. (1983) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 210
Cited by
Precise Nanometer Localization Analysis for Individual Fluorescent Probes
Thompson, R. E., Larson, D. R., & Webb, W. W. (2002) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75618-x · Cited by 2,320
Michalet, X. (2010) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.82.041914 · Cited by 721
Localization Accuracy in Single-Molecule Microscopy
Ober, R. J., Ram, S., & Ward, E. S. (2004) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(04)74193-4 · Cited by 587
Eckle, P., Smolarski, M., Schlup, P., Biegert, J., Staudte, A., Schöffler, M., Muller, H. G., Dörner, R., & Keller, U. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys982 · Cited by 490
Quantum theory of superresolution for two incoherent optical point sources
Tsang, M., Nair, R., & Lu, X.-M. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.031033 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Bobroff, N.
- Venue
- Review of Scientific Instruments
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1986-06-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1152-1157
- ISSN
- 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7623
- OpenAlex
- W2090897377
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Position measurement with a resolution and noise-limited instrument. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1138619
- The paper
- Bobroff, N. (1986). Position measurement with a resolution and noise-limited instrument. Review of Scientific Instruments. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1138619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.