The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis
Abstract
view Abstract Citations (2400) References (10) Co-Reads Similar Papers Volume Content Graphics Metrics Export Citation NASA/ADS A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. Milgrom, M. Abstract The author considers the possibility that there is not, in fact, much hidden mass in galaxies and galaxy systems. If a certain modified version of the Newtonian dynamics is used to describe the motion of bodies in a gravitational field (of a galaxy, say), the observational results are reproduced with no need to assume hidden mass in appreciable quantities. Various characteristics of galaxies result with no further assumptions. The basis of the modification is the assumption that in the limit of small acceleration a very low a0, the acceleration of a particle at distance r from a mass M satisfies approximately a2/a0 ≈ MGr-2, where a0 is a constant of the dimensions of an acceleration. Publication: The Astrophysical Journal Pub Date: July 1983 DOI: 10.1086/161130 Bibcode: 1983ApJ...270..365M Keywords: Cosmology; Galactic Structure; Nonrelativistic Mechanics; Stellar Motions; Particle Acceleration; Solar System; Astrophysics full text sources ADS |
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR): the asymptotic circular speed depends only on the total baryonic mass and a 0, predicting a flat RC independent of radius.”
From The rotation curve of the Milky Way: State of the art, the Keplerian decline debate, and implications for dark matter (2026) · cites this paper as Milgrom (1983)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Copeland, E. J., Sami, M., & Tsujikawa, S. (2006) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x · Cited by 6,733
The cosmological constant and dark energy
Peebles, P. J. E., & Ratra, B. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.559 · Cited by 5,624
Sotiriou, T. P., & Faraoni, V. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 · Cited by 4,519
Modified gravity and cosmology
Clifton, T., Ferreira, P. G., Padilla, A., & Skordis, C. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001 · Cited by 4,630
“To be more specific, they should lead to Milgrom’s Modified Newtonian Dynamics [895], also known as MOND, in regimes of low acceleration.”
MethodInfluentialThe Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Metadata
- Authors
- Milgrom, M.
- Corresponding author
- Milgrom, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1983-07
- Volume
- 270
- Pages
- 365
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1990148897
- Cited by
- 3,316
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 147 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 187 · 2022: 155 · 2021: 200 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 165 · 2018: 189 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 146 · 2015: 138 · 2014: 135 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 122
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- MOND, dark matter, galaxy rotation curves, hidden mass, galaxy dynamics, modified gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review