The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis
Abstract
view Abstract Citations (2400) References (10) Co-Reads Similar Papers Volume Content Graphics Metrics Export Citation NASA/ADS A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. Milgrom, M. Abstract The author considers the possibility that there is not, in fact, much hidden mass in galaxies and galaxy systems. If a certain modified version of the Newtonian dynamics is used to describe the motion of bodies in a gravitational field (of a galaxy, say), the observational results are reproduced with no need to assume hidden mass in appreciable quantities. Various characteristics of galaxies result with no further assumptions. The basis of the modification is the assumption that in the limit of small acceleration a very low a0, the acceleration of a particle at distance r from a mass M satisfies approximately a2/a0 ≈ MGr-2, where a0 is a constant of the dimensions of an acceleration. Publication: The Astrophysical Journal Pub Date: July 1983 DOI: 10.1086/161130 Bibcode: 1983ApJ...270..365M Keywords: Cosmology; Galactic Structure; Nonrelativistic Mechanics; Stellar Motions; Particle Acceleration; Solar System; Astrophysics full text sources ADS |
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR): the asymptotic circular speed depends only on the total baryonic mass and a 0, predicting a flat RC independent of radius.”
From The rotation curve of the Milky Way: State of the art, the Keplerian decline debate, and implications for dark matter (2026) · cites this paper as Milgrom (1983)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Copeland, E. J., Sami, M., & Tsujikawa, S. (2006) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x · Cited by 6,733
The cosmological constant and dark energy
Peebles, P. J. E., & Ratra, B. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.559 · Cited by 5,624
Sotiriou, T. P., & Faraoni, V. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 · Cited by 4,519
Modified gravity and cosmology
Clifton, T., Ferreira, P. G., Padilla, A., & Skordis, C. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001 · Cited by 4,630
“To be more specific, they should lead to Milgrom’s Modified Newtonian Dynamics [895], also known as MOND, in regimes of low acceleration.”
MethodInfluentialThe Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2011) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.024020 · Cited by 2,888
A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter
Clowe, D., Bradač, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Markevitch, M., Randall, S. W., Jones, C., & Zaritsky, D. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/508162 · Cited by 2,470
DWARF GALAXIES OF THE LOCAL GROUP
Mateo, M. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.435 · Cited by 2,325
Vogelsberger, M., Genel, S., Springel, V., Torrey, P., Sijacki, D., Xu, D., Snyder, G., Nelson, D., & Hernquist, L. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1536 · Cited by 2,251
“We note that the BTFR is a strong prediction of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (Milgrom 1983) as an alternative of CDM.”
MethodSearch for new physics with atoms and molecules
Safronova, M. S., Budker, D., DeMille, D. P., Kimball, D. F. J., Derevianko, A., & Clark, C. W. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.025008 · Cited by 1,642
“…the new scalar component of gravity is somehow screened within the solar system, for example via self-interactions (Khoury and Weltman, 2004b; Olive and Pospelov, 2008), modified Newtonian dynamics 66 [MOND; see, for example, the work of Milgrom (1983)], or other nonlinearities (Vainshtein, 1972).”
BackgroundRelativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dynamics paradigm
Bekenstein, J. D. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.083509 · Cited by 1,487
Bertone, G., & Hooper, D. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 · Cited by 1,241
“In February 1982, Mordehai Milgrom submitted a trio of papers to the Astrophysical Journal (Milgrom, 1983a, 1983b, 1983c).”
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
“This mechanism is useful for constructing theories of MOdified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) [187].”
Cappellari, M., Bacon, R. M., Bureau, M., Damen, M., Davies, R. L., de Zeeuw, P. T., Emsellem, É., Falcón‐Barroso, J., Krajnović, D., Kuntschner, H., et al. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09981.x · Cited by 1,128
Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S. A., Avgoustidis, A., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., et al. (2018) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3 · Cited by 1,096
Extra force in f(R) modified theories of gravity
Orfeu Bertolami, A., Böhmer, C. G., Harko, T., & Lobo, F. S. N. (2007) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.104016 · Cited by 1,011
Markevitch, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Clowe, D., Vikhlinin, A., Forman, W., Jones, C., Murray, S., & Tucker, W. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383178 · Cited by 942
Non-baryonic dark matter: observational evidence and detection methods
Bergström, L. (2000) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/63/5/2r3 · Cited by 894
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
“In 1983 it was suggested by Milgrom [869] that the emerging evidence for the presence of dark matter in galaxies could follow from a modification either to how ‘baryonic’ matter responded to the Newtonian gravitational field it created or to how the gravitational field was related to the baryonic matter density.”
BackgroundModified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions
Famaey, B., & McGaugh, S. S. (2012) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2012-10 · Cited by 1,046
“4), have been elegantly unified by the single law proposed by Milgrom [293] in 1983 as a unique scaling relation between the gravitational field generated by observed baryons and the total observed gravitational force in galaxies.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExtended theories of gravity and their cosmological and astrophysical applications
Capozzıello, S., & Francaviglia, M. (2007) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0551-y · Cited by 910
Li, M., Li, X.-D., Wang, S., & Wang, Y. (2011) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/56/3/24 · Cited by 896
Quantum Gravity in Everyday Life: General Relativity as an Effective Field Theory
Burgess, C. P. (2004) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2004-5 · Cited by 748
Shocks and cold fronts in galaxy clusters
Markevitch, M., & Vikhlinin, A. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.01.001 · Cited by 726
Vagnozzi, S., Roy, R., Tsai, Y.-D., Visinelli, L., Afrin, M., Allahyari, A., Bambhaniya, P., Dey, D., Ghosh, S. G., Joshi, P. S., et al. (2023) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acd97b · Cited by 924
Modified Newtonian Dynamics as an Alternative to Dark Matter
Sanders, R. H., & McGaugh, S. S. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093923 · Cited by 728
Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers GW150914 and GW151226
Yunes, N., Yagi, K., & Pretorius, F. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.084002 · Cited by 785
Clowe, D., Gonzalez, A., & Markevitch, M. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/381970 · Cited by 638
On modifications of Newton's second law and linear continuum elastodynamics
Milton, G. W., & Willis, J. R. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2006.1795 · Cited by 647
Cosmological simulations of galaxy formation
Vogelsberger, M., Marinacci, F., Torrey, P., & Puchwein, E. (2020) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0127-2 · Cited by 710
The cored distribution of dark matter in spiral galaxies
Gentile, G., Salucci, P., Klein, U., Vergani, D., & Kalberla, P. M. W. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07836.x · Cited by 578
WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects
Roszkowski, L., Sessolo, E. M., & Trojanowski, S. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab913 · Cited by 653
“This includes modifying gravity (MOND) [32] which still needs to invoke DM in order to explain all data [33], or cosmic fluid [34] which is also increasingly challenged by observations, see, e.”
BackgroundEmergent Gravity and the Dark Universe
Verlinde, E. (2017) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.2.3.016 · Cited by 727
“We have thus given an explanation for the phenomenological success of Milgrom’s fitting formula, in particular in reproducing the flattening of rotation curves.”
MethodInfluentialFreire, P. C. C., Wex, N., Esposito-Farèse, G., Verbiest, J. P. W., Bailes, M., Jacoby, B. A., Krämer, M., Stairs, I. H., Antoniadis, J., & Janssen, G. H. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21253.x · Cited by 563
“…specifically in Section 5 for tensor-scalar theories of gravity and in Section 6 for a class of tensor-vector-scalar theories of gravity similar to the theory proposed by Bekenstein (2004), which is a relativistic formulation of the Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) proposed by Milgrom (1983).”
BackgroundMethodCan dark matter be a Bose–Einstein condensate?
Böhmer, C. G., & Harko, T. (2007) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/06/025 · Cited by 535
THE SAGITTARIUS DWARF GALAXY: A MODEL FOR EVOLUTION IN A TRIAXIAL MILKY WAY HALO
Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/229 · Cited by 550
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2001) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-4 · Cited by 609
A new era in the search for dark matter
Bertone, G., & Tait, T. M. P. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0542-z · Cited by 526
Avoiding Dark Energy with 1/R Modifications of Gravity
Woodard, R. P. (2007) · Lecture notes in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71013-4_14 · Cited by 518
Dynamical Family Properties and Dark Halo Scaling Relations of Giant Elliptical Galaxies
Gerhard, O., Kronawitter, A., Saglia, R. P., & Bender, R. (2001) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/319940 · Cited by 509
Chavanis, P.-H. (2011) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.043531 · Cited by 505
Relation between physical and gravitational geometry
Bekenstein, J. D. (1993) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.3641 · Cited by 503
Modified Newtonian Dynamics as an Alternative to Dark Matter
Sanders, R. H., & McGaugh, S. S. (2002) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 493
Read, J. I. (2014) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/41/6/063101 · Cited by 489
“Alternative gravity theories like MOND (Milgrom, 1983) and its relativistic extension TeVeS (Bekenstein, 2004) face a host of observational challenges6 (e.g. Clowe et al., 2006; Natarajan & Zhao, 2008; Ibata et al., 2011; Dodelson, 2011).”
BackgroundModified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic ExtensionsPreprint
Famaey, B., & McGaugh, S. (2012) · Cited by 541
Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity
Joyce, A., Lombriser, L., & Schmidt, F. (2016) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553 · Cited by 463
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449
“The dark matter problem motivated the introduction of modified gravity (MG) theories that would explain such observations by a small modification to Kepler laws such as Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) (Milgrom, 1983b), its relativistic generalization known as TeVeS (tensor-vector-scalar) theory (Bekenstein, 2004),…”
van Dokkum, P., Danieli, S., Cohen, Y., Merritt, A., Romanowsky, A. J., Abraham, R. G., Brodie, J. P., Conroy, C., Lokhorst, D., Mowla, L., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25767 · Cited by 511
The Local Dark Matter DensityPreprint
Read, J. I. (2016) · Cited by 494
Photon and graviton mass limits
Goldhaber, A. S., & Nieto, M. M. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.939 · Cited by 445
Alternatives to dark matter and dark energy
Mannheim, P. D. (2005) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.08.001 · Cited by 424
Ferreira, E. G. M. (2021) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00135-6 · Cited by 578
Weak Gravitational Lensing and Its Cosmological Applications
Hoekstra, H., & Jain, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.58.110707.171151 · Cited by 441
Dark matter direct-detection experiments
Undagoitia, T. M., & Rauch, L. (2015) · Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/1/013001 · Cited by 474
“While TeVeS can solve some of the conceptual problems of MOND, the required parameters seem to generate an unstable Universe [31] or fails to simultaneously fit lensing and rotation curves [32].”
Stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars from Gaia DR2
Kervella, P., Arenou, F., Mignard, F., & Thévenin, F. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834371 · Cited by 431
“As discussed by Beech (2009, 2011) and Banik & Zhao (2018), very high precision astrometry of Proxima could provide a test of the modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) theory (Milgrom 1983; Bekenstein 2004).”
BackgroundBamba, K., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/045 · Cited by 390
Constraining f ( R ) gravity as a scalar-tensor theory
Faulkner, T., Tegmark, M., Bunn, E., & Mao, Y. (2006) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.063505 · Cited by 325
A White Paper on keV sterile neutrino Dark Matter
Adhikari, R., Agostini, M., Ky, N. A., Araki, T., Archidiacono, M., Bahr, M., Baur, J., Behrens, J., Bezrukov, F. L., Dev, P. S. B., et al. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/025 · Cited by 592
“Alternative explanations based on a modification of the law of gravity [16] have not been able to match the observations on various different scales.”
BackgroundTesting general relativity with atom interferometry.
Dimopoulos, S., Graham, P., Hogan, J., & Kasevich, M. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.111102 · Cited by 277
Probes and Tests of Strong-Field Gravity with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum
Psaltis, D. (2008) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-9 · Cited by 425
Properties of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos from Weak Lensing
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H. K. C., & Gladders, M. D. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/382726 · Cited by 353
Modified Newtonian dynamics in the Milky Way
Famaey, B., & Binney, J. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09474.x · Cited by 348
Galaxy Rotation Curves without Nonbaryonic Dark Matter
Brownstein, J. R., & Moffat, J. W. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/498208 · Cited by 318
Modifying gravity with the aether: An alternative to dark matter
Zlosnik, T. G., Ferreira, P. G., & Starkman, G. D. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.044017 · Cited by 320
Ferguson, H. C., & Binggeli, B. (1994) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/bf01208252 · Cited by 318
Valentino, E. D., Said, J. L., Riess, A. G., Pollo, A., Poulin, V., Gómez-Valent, A., Weltman, A., Palmese, A., Huang, C. D., van de Bruck, C., et al. (2025) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 · Cited by 590
Avoiding Dark Energy with 1/R Modifications of Gravity
Woodard, R. P. (2006) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 312
Jain, B., & Khoury, J. (2010) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.04.002 · Cited by 314
Generalized Curvature-Matter Couplings in Modified Gravity
Harko, T., & Lobo, F. S. N. (2014) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies2030410 · Cited by 307
“This case may also correspond to a MOND-type acceleration aE ≈ √ a0aN = √ GM a0/r, where a0 is a constant acceleration, which was proposed phenomenologically as a dynamical model for dark matter [105,106].”
BackgroundCosmology with weak lensing surveys
Munshi, D., Valageas, P., Waerbeke, L. V., & Heavens, A. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.02.003 · Cited by 313
The current status of galaxy formation
Silk, J., & Mamon, G. A. (2012) · Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/8/004 · Cited by 294
“This is an important issue as the normalization, slope and linearity of the BTFR have been used as evidence for MOdified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND, Milgrom, 1983) and against ΛCDM.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCourteau, S., Cappellari, M., de Jong, R. S., Dutton, A. A., Emsellem, É., Hoekstra, H., Koopmans, L. V. E., Mamon, G. A., Maraston, C., Treu, T., et al. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.47 · Cited by 310
“Alternatives exist, the most popular being MOND (e.g. Milgrom 1983), but a proper treatment of them is beyond the scope of this review.”
BackgroundLarge Scale Structure in Bekenstein’s Theory of Relativistic Modified Newtonian Dynamics
Skordis, C., Mota, D. F., Ferreira, P. G., & Bœhm, C. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.011301 · Cited by 295
Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*
Billard, J., Boulay, M. G., Cebrián, S., Covi, L., Fiorillo, G., Green, A. M., Kopp, J., Majorovits, B., Palladino, K. J., Petricca, F., et al. (2022) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac5754 · Cited by 405
Dark energy and dark matter as curvature effects?
Capozzıello, S., Cardone, V. F., & Troisi, A. (2006) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/08/001 · Cited by 315
Dark matter and the early Universe: A review
Arbey, A., & Mahmoudi, F. (2021) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103865 · Cited by 386
Proxima’s orbit around α Centauri
Kervella, P., Thévenin, F., & Lovis, C. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629930 · Cited by 284
“Due to the very weak gravitational interaction between Proxima and αCen, Beech (2009, 2011, 2015) proposed that this system could be a test case for the modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) theory (Milgrom 1983; Bekenstein 2004).”
BackgroundChavanis, P.-H., & Delfini, L. (2011) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.043532 · Cited by 283
Model-Independent Constraints on Possible Modifications of Newtonian Gravity
Talmadge, C. L., Berthias, J. P., Hellings, R. W., & STANDISH, E. M. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.1159 · Cited by 276
BABICHEV, E., DEFFAYET, C., & ZIOUR, R. (2009) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271809016107 · Cited by 278
Relativistic cosmology and large-scale structure
Tsagas, C. G., Challinor, A. D., & Maartens, R. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.03.003 · Cited by 287
Quasi-linear formulation of MOND
Milgrom, M. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16184.x · Cited by 279
Self-citationTheory of dark matter superfluidity
Berezhiani, L., & Khoury, J. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.103510 · Cited by 308
Small Scale Problems of the ΛCDM Model: A Short Review
Popolo, A. D., & Delliou, M. L. (2017) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies5010017 · Cited by 316
“More radical alternative solutions modified the spectrum at small scales (e.g.,[237]), or gravity (e.g., f (R) [238,239], f (T) theories – see [240–243], or the Modified Newton Dynamics – MOND, [244,245])2.”
MethodInfluentialA new look at the large-scale H I structure of the Large Magellanic Cloud
Staveley‐Smith, L., Kim, S., Calabretta, M. R., Haynes, R. F., & Kesteven, M. J. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06146.x · Cited by 251
Disformal invariance of second order scalar-tensor theories: Framing the Horndeski action
Bettoni, D., & Liberati, S. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.084020 · Cited by 249
“Moffat, Scalar-tensor-vector gravity theory, JCAP03(2006)004 [7] M.”
Dark matter as a geometric effect in f(R) gravity
Böhmer, C. G., Harko, T., & Lobo, F. S. N. (2008) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2008.04.003 · Cited by 249
Mimetic Gravity: A Review of Recent Developments and Applications to Cosmology and Astrophysics
Sebastiani, L., Vagnozzi, S., & Myrzakulov, R. (2017) · Advances in High Energy Physics · doi:10.1155/2017/3156915 · Cited by 278
“The key idea is closely related to that ofMOND[550]: to introduce”
BackgroundMilgrom, M. (2009) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.123536 · Cited by 245
Self-citationDark matter heats up in dwarf galaxies
Read, J. I., Walker, M. G., & Steger, P. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3404 · Cited by 263
The Dark Matter Crisis: Falsification of the Current Standard Model of Cosmology
Kroupa, P. (2012) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as12005 · Cited by 230
“In both cases, effective gravity would be non-Newtonian and is described by Mordehai Milgrom’s formulation (Milgrom 1983a).”
InfluentialClusters of galaxies with modified Newtonian dynamics
Sanders, R. H. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06596.x · Cited by 244
New Relativistic Theory for Modified Newtonian Dynamics
Skordis, C., & Zlosnik, T. G. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.161302 · Cited by 219
Local-Group tests of dark-matter concordance cosmology
Kroupa, P., Famaey, B., de Boer, K. S., Dabringhausen, J., Pawlowski, M. S., Boily, C. M., Jerjen, H., Forbes, D. A., Hensler, G., & Metz, M. (2010) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014892 · Cited by 257
NGC 3741: the dark halo profile from the most extended rotation curve
Gentile, G., Salucci, P., Klein, U., & Granato, G. L. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11283.x · Cited by 218
H I KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS OF MESSIER 31
Chemin, L., Claude Carignan, A., & Foster, T. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/705/2/1395 · Cited by 221
Cosmic distance-duality as a probe of exotic physics and acceleration
Bassett, B. A., & Kunz, M. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.101305 · Cited by 215
The MOG weak field approximation and observational test of galaxy rotation curves
Moffat, J. W., & Rahvar, S. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1670 · Cited by 208
“There are various approaches to modifying gravity, such as MOdified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) or its relativistic version the so-called Tensor–Vector–Scalar (TeVeS) theory (Milgrom 1983; Bekenstein 2004).”
MethodDark matter, dark energy, and alternate models: A review
Arun, K., Gudennavar, S. B., & Sivaram, C. (2017) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2017.03.043 · Cited by 209
“Perhaps critical acceleration is given as 00 cHa ª and it is related to cosmological constant by Lª 2 0 ca (Sivaram, 1994a, Milgrom, 1983a).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Milgrom, M.
- Corresponding author
- Milgrom, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1983-07
- Volume
- 270
- Pages
- 365
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1990148897
- Cited by
- 3,316
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 147 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 187 · 2022: 155 · 2021: 200 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 165 · 2018: 189 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 146 · 2015: 138 · 2014: 135 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 122
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- MOND, dark matter, galaxy rotation curves, hidden mass, galaxy dynamics, modified gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review