Cited by 123Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Low-Mass Stars. III. Low-Mass Stars with Steady Mass Loss: Up to the Asymptotic Giant Branch and through the Final Thermal Pulses

Boothroyd, Arnold I., Sackmann, I.-Juliana·1988·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Detailed stellar evolutionary calculations were carried out for a metal-poor case (Z = 0.001) for stars of initial masses 1.0 Msun, 1.2 Msun, 2.0 Msun, and 3.0 Msun, and for a metal-rich case (Z = 0.02) for stars of initial masses 1.2 Msun and 3.0 Msun. Ongoing mass loss via a Reimers-type wind was included. The latest nuclear reaction rates were used, as well as the latest Los Alamos opacities, including low-temperature carbon opacities and some molecular opacities. The stars were evolved from the main sequence through the red giant branch (RGB), including the helium core flash that occurs in stars of Mi < 2 Msun, through core helium burning on the horizontal branch, and finally through a number of helium shell flashes (thermal pulses) on the asymptotic giant branch. A reasonable wind mass loss rate severely limits the total number of flashes experienced on the AGB, particularly for stars of initial masses Mi 1.2 Msun. Also, it was found that for stars of Z = 0.001, only stars of Mi < 2 Msun experience flashes at a low enough core mass to become carbon stars while still satisfying the observational initial-final mass relation discovered by Weidemann and Koester; it was found that a Reimers wind mass loss is sufficient to account for the total mass loss required by the Weidemann-Koester relation in stars of Mi < 1.5 Msun, but that additional mass loss is required for higher initial masses. It should be noted that the correct choice of Reimers wind parameter η depends sensitively on the choice of mixing length (i.e., η ∝ 1/α), composition, and opacities; for low-mass stars of Z = 0.001, a value of η = 0.4 is appropriate only for #8alpha; ≈ 2. The onset of shell flashes was found to occur considerably earlier in luminosity than indicated by the IbenRenzini relation, allowing flashes to build up in strength before reaching the luminosity domain where carbon stars are observed to exist. This flash onset turned out to occur much lower in luminosity for high-Z stars than for low-Z stars; it was a much steeper function of the star's initial mass for the low-Z case than for the high-Z case. The flash strength L maxHe was not found to level out for the later flashes, but rather to grow linearly, growing faster (and reaching considerably greater strengths) for low-Z stars than for high-Z stars. No evidence was found for the existence of any universal curve giving L maxHe as a function of core mass Mc = MH. This implies that misleading results may be obtained from the commonly used computational shortcut or arbitrarily manipulating envelope mass or core mass in the hopes of simulating the behavior of a star of different initial mass. Other general relations that do exist, including the Mc - Tb and Mc - τi f relations, turn out to depend appreciably on the composition. The new, increased 12C(α, γ)16O reaction rate resulted in carbon-poor, oxygen-rich cores (C ∼ 20%, O ∼ 80%), but had little effect on flash-produced "carbon pocket" abundances (C ∼ 20%, 16O ∼ 2%), nor did any significant 20Ne-production via 16O(α, γ) 20Ne result from the increased 16O production. One run (Mi = 3.0 Msun, Z = 0.02) was performed with a new, increased 14N(p, γ)15 O reaction rate; this proved to have little effect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/166323

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Boothroyd, A. I., & Sackmann, I.-J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1988-05
Volume
328
Pages
653
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1998899495
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
low-mass stars, stellar evolution, asymptotic giant branch, thermal pulses, helium shell flash, carbon stars, initial-final mass relation, metallicity effects, mixing-length parameter, core helium flash, horizontal branch, red giant branch, stellar opacity, stellar mass loss, stellar nucleosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review